The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Thursday, October 29, 2026

Prosec raises possible tax evasion in VP Duterte’s income gap

Translate

MANILA, Philippines — v citing an alleged P111.85-million gap between her declared income and bank deposits examined during her Senate impeachment trial.

In a press briefing, Alonto Adiong said the discrepancy raised questions not only about Duterte’s alleged unexplained wealth but also about whether she had properly declared her income and paid the correct taxes.

He cited financial records showing P174.96 million in bank inflows compared with P63.11 million in declared income from 2022 to 2025, leaving a difference of P111.85 million.

Article continues after this advertisement

Those figures were part of the findings of forensic accounting expert Alexander Cabrera, who examined Duterte’s income tax returns, bank records, and other financial documents, which were presented during the impeachment trial.

FEATURED STORIES

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

READ: VP’s total unexplained wealth at P817.87M – witness’ report

Cabrera included the P111.85-million alleged undeclared income in his broader estimate of P817.87 million in unexplained wealth and undeclared assets involving Duterte and her husband, lawyer Manases “Mans” Carpio.

According to Alonto Adiong, the prosecution wanted Duterte to explain the sources of the deposits and why the amounts differed from the income reported to the Bureau of Internal Revenue.

The alleged discrepancy forms part of the second impeachment article, which accuses Duterte of accumulating unexplained wealth and failing to fully disclose all her assets.

Article continues after this advertisement

The prosecution maintains that public officials must be able to account for their wealth and show that their assets came from lawful sources.

READ: Analyst: VP Sara didn’t declare P817-million wealth

Article continues after this advertisement

Duterte has denied wrongdoing, while her lawyers have challenged the prosecution’s evidence and conclusions.

The House prosecution has retained only Article II after withdrawing three other impeachment charges.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.

Your subscription has been successful.

The defense is scheduled to begin presenting evidence when the trial resumes Nov. 9. /atm

View the original on Inquirer →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.