Netflix's Surprise Season 2 Renewal Exposes an Unfortunate Emmys Loophole

Published Sep 29, 2026, 7:18 PM EDT

Lloyd 'Happy Trails' Farley: the man, the myth, the legend. What can be said about this amazing - and humble - man that hasn't been said before? Or, more accurately, what can be said in public? Born in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, Lloyd is a master of puns and a humorist, who has authored one pun book to date - Pun and Grimeish Mint - and is working on a second. His time with Collider has allowed Lloyd's passion for writing to explode, with nearly 1,000 articles to his name that have been published on the site, with his favorite articles being the ones that allow for his sense of humor to shine. Lloyd also holds fast to the belief that all of life's problems can be answered by The Simpsons, Star Wars, and/or The Lion King. You can read more about Lloyd on his website, or follow his Facebook page and join the Llama Llegion. Happy trails!

The Beast in Me has been a huge success for Netflix, with viewers in the millions and a veritable cornucopia of award nominations. Out of those nominations, The Beast in Me ended up winning two Emmy Awards — one for Outstanding Music Composition for a Limited or Anthology Series, Movie or Special, and another for Matthew Rhys, who was awarded the first of his two Emmys that night for Outstanding Lead Actor in a Limited or Anthology Series or Movie (with the second being for Lead Actor for his work in Widow's Bay).

Arguably, The Beast in Me could have won more in the Limited Series categories without anyone batting an eye, because it's a limited series... right? Well, that's the problem. The Beast in Me was announced as an eight-episode series, premiering on the streamer on November 14, 2025. But barely a week after its Emmy wins, the show was renewed for a second season, exposing a major loophole in the Emmys submission process.

Was Netflix Already Planning To Renew 'The Beast in Me' for Season 2?

This isn't an indictment of The Beast in Me by any stretch, but rather whether its wins were in the right category. It's hard to say, and Netflix is unlikely to be forthcoming about its intentions, so we're left to speculate. On the one hand, if The Beast in Me was submitted for Emmy consideration as a limited series, with the full intention of having only one season, then what happens afterward is moot. But if Netflix had plans to renew the series before submitting it to the Emmys' limited series categories, that changes things.

Based on the official rules and procedures for the 78th Emmy Awards, submissions were opened on February 19, 2026, and the deadline for submissions was May 7, 2026. That means that all eight episodes of the series were released nearly a full six months prior to the submission deadline. By that point, the average viewership and critical reception would have already peaked, so it's hard to believe that a renewal wasn't already in mind.

The more likely explanation is the competition within each category. The Beast in Me had a legitimate shot for Outstanding Limited Series, despite not winning. Going up against powerhouse The Pitt for Outstanding Drama Series, especially given the Emmys' penchant for repeatedly awarding the same shows every year, would have been a tougher fight. But it's the Outstanding Actor categories that make the stronger argument for why Netflix would have submitted as it did. Had the streamer submitted The Beast in Me for Outstanding Drama, that would instantly require any other submissions for the same show to follow suit. In this case, it would mean that Matthew Rhys would have been competing against himself in the Outstanding Lead Actor in a Drama category, splitting the votes and likely not walking away with anything at all. The fact that there is precedent certainly doesn't help matters.

The Emmys Needs To Close the Loophole That 'The Beast in Me's Renewal Exposed

The right thing would have been for Netflix not to submit The Beast in Me as a limited series, but there is literally no way to prove the streamer's intentions. The Emmy wins could just as easily have led to the powers that be at Netflix gathering around the table the next day to hand down an official renewal. In the meantime, the Drama versus Limited Series loophole remains open, an unfortunate circumstance that the Emmys are currently unable to prevent.

The Television Academy could, and from a pure optics viewpoint should, place conditions on a limited series submission. A caveat would certainly give a streamer like Netflix a reason to pause — something to the effect that any series submitted for the Limited Series category can't be renewed for a period of one year, with the penalty being the revoking of any Emmy wins. Doing so would maintain the integrity of an institution that has struggled in the past to find it. It's certainly far more equitable; the optics on both parties look better, and it doesn't shut the door outright on renewal should the show in question find success, as The Beast in Me did. It may not fully close the loophole, but a rule change would make it harder to exploit, and maybe that's enough.