ESPNTransfer rumors, news: Premier League clubs eye Alexander-Arnold amid Real Madrid uncertaintyInquirerGeneral Santos City heat index hits 55°C Tuesday morningThe Jerusalem PostManhunt launched as suspect flees scene of attempted ramming of police officer near Modi'inRTP DesportoCarlos Vicens despedido do Sp. BragaPunchPolitical elite do not believe in free, fair elections – Ex-INEC commissionerZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-NachrichtenstudioNHK 社会遺体なき傷害致死事件 夫に懲役12年6か月の判決 大阪地裁n-tvZinsen mehr als vervierfacht: Wenn der Immobilienkredit plötzlich 150.000 Euro mehr kostetDaily MaverickBANA PELE: ECD subsidy expands as government races to close SA’s one-million-child gapABC NewsMidterm vote is about 'what's best for my family': Voters talk 2026 midtermsNOSMan opgepakt voor brand in stadhuis Limoges, is bekende van Franse politieAntara NewsIndonesia pushes universities to accelerate net-zero transition
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Tuesday, October 20, 2026

United CEO backs national wealth tax, inheritance levies

Translate
Tax season concept of making money and paying tax

imagedepotpro/iStock via Getty Images

United Airlines (UAL) CEO Scott Kirby, who earned a little over $32M last year, has backed the idea of a national wealth tax and said he would be willing to pay it.

"Wealth inequality has become a danger to our society, and we need to address that," he said in an interview with The New York Times.

"We should have a national wealth tax — it won't work by state because people will just move," Kirby noted. "And I think we should have inheritance taxes that get close to 100% at some level. I would pay them."

Kirby joins other business leaders who have voiced support for raising taxes on wealthy individuals in the past, including Warren Buffett and George Soros.

While it's unlikely that the U.S. will introduce a wealth tax at the federal level, a few states are working towards imposing such levies.

For example, Californians will vote on a wealth tax (Proposition 40) in next month's election. If approved, a one-time 5% tax would be imposed on billionaires living in the state to help fund healthcare and education.

But in a working paper published by the National Bureau of Economic Research, Stanford University economists cautioned that California may end up collecting far less taxes than previously estimated.

Prop 40 may ultimately generate only about $30B in revenue, compared to the $100B that the measure's authors estimated, as a result of billionaires moving out of the state.

"This accounts for the publicly confirmed taxpayer migration that has already eliminated nearly 30% of the wealth tax base," Stanford economists noted.

View the original on Seeking Alpha →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.