ESPN🎵 Jay-Z to headline Super Bowl halftime Super Bowl LXI: Feb. 14 on ESPN networks From 'no' to halftime show: The clues behind Jay-Z's Super Bowl nodESPN DeportesLaLiga denunciará agresión a Camavinga vs. BarçaBollywood HungamaSCOOP: Salman Khan’s Maatrubhumi STILL awaits CBFC screening despite government clearance; November 13 release eyed to avoid clashes with Yeh Prem Mol Liya, EethaThe Jerusalem PostKnife-wielding man detained after approaching Democrats' Golan during Election Day tour in Tel AvivInquirerBarbers: What’s the exact extent of VP Duterte’s business interests?RapplerWith El Niño, 2026-2027 northeast monsoon may not be as coldZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFWirtualna PolskaKarol Nawrocki będzie zeznawał w sądzie. Jest terminMyJoyOnlineKofi Hayford shines as MC of M.anifest’s ‘Nowhere Cool’ at 10 celebrationComplete SportsEUROMATCH NPFL: Kun Khalifat Appoint Nwabuwah As Co-ordinator For 2026/27 SeasonVilaWebLa Comissió Europea proposa d’ampliar el mandat de Frontex per deportar migrants des de fora de la UEConsequenceFoo Fighters Launch Week-Long Takeover of Kimmel with Performance of “Window”
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Tuesday, October 27, 2026

Why entire system working to help pharmaceutical manufacturers, asks SC

Translate

New Delhi, Why is the entire system working to help pharmaceutical manufacturers, asked the Supreme Court on Tuesday while questioning the Centre over the massive difference between the MRP of medicines and the price to retailers.

The Centre told the apex court that the government policy "is that the entire ecosystem is not to be controlled".

"Why is the entire system working to help these people ," a bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta asked during the hearing.

It observed that the National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority seems to be a "totally defunct" body.

The bench was hearing two petitions, which flagged the issue of pricing of medicines in the country.

Referring to the massive difference between the MRP and the price to the retailer, the bench said, "The government is allowing this to happen. It is under the government's own eyes that it is happening."

"Should it be allowed to run amok?" the bench asked.

Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati, appearing for the Centre, told the bench that medicine prices in India were among the lowest in the world.

The bench reserved its order in the matter.

While hearing the matter on October 12, the top court had said the Centre's response on capping the trade margin of anti-cancer drugs at 30 per cent of the maximum retail price was "hardly anything to be happy about" and questioned why the government cannot cap trade margins of other medicines.

The Centre, which had earlier come under severe criticism from the top court for steep markup of cancer drugs by hospitals, said that the government has taken an important decision to cap the trade margin on anti-cancer drugs at 30 per cent of the MRP, which is expected to result in annual savings of approximately ₹2,500 crore to patients.

This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

View the original on Hindustan Times →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.