The Jerusalem PostBasketball: Micic puts up 31 points in Tel Aviv derby victoryBBC عربيترامب يُقر بأن الحرب مع إيران أدّت إلى خسارة الانتخابات، لكنه يؤكد أنه "سيفعل ذلك مجدداً" إذا لزم الأمرBBC BusinessPound rises to its highest level since the Brexit referendumCBC NewsNASA's Swift space telescope plunges to Earth after 22 years in orbitHipertextualUn ciberataque altera los bancos de sangre en Francia y enciende las alarmas en EuropaANSAAddio a Tinto Brass, maestro del cinema eroticoEuronewsZelenski makes surprise visit to Madrid for talks with Sánchez and Latin American leadersPremium TimesUS seeks stronger trade ties with NigeriaABC NewsDow closes up 1,500 points as Democrats take control of CongressDaily MaverickLAW AND DISORDER: Slain Joburg attorney represented PA councillor linked to disputed gang claimsZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-Nachrichtenstudio3DNewsДля NPU нашлось полезное применение: его научили отрисовывать интерфейс Windows 11 вместо GPU — пока получается не очень быстро
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, November 4, 2026

Alex Garland’s ‘Civil War’ Gets Second Look After Texas Turns Blue: “You Owe Him an Apology”

Translate

Alex Garland‘s 2024 dystopian thriller Civil War has been going viral in the wake of the Democrats winning the Texas governor’s mansion and a U.S. Senate seat for the first time in decades.

In the film set in the near future, California and Texas were partnered up and were called the “Western Forces.” The states were resisting a tyrannical president amid a civil war tearing the country apart.

The alliance between a traditionally entrenched blue state and a red state wasn’t explicitly explained in the film, leading to a lot of head scratching, confusion and even some outright criticism among viewers.

But given senator-elect James Talarico and governor-elect Gina Hinojosa’s victories last night, people are giving the film’s premise another look.

One user on X posted the divided U.S. map from the film and wrote, “You all owe Alex Garland an apology.”

An editor for The Bulwark wrote, “Me: CIVIL WAR was intentionally vague to the point of ideological incoherence to avoid mapping on to current culture war nonsense. Alex Garland: I literally foresaw California and Texas rising against the populist fraud in the White House.”

Amid the film’s release, Garland explained at South by Southwest that he thought the film’s premise alone was enough to lead viewers to a conclusion about why the states were allied.

“I personally think questions are answered,” Garland said. “There is a fascist president who smashed the Constitution and attacked [American] citizens. And that is a very clear, answered statement. If you want to think about why Texas and California might be allied, and put aside their political differences, the answer would be implicit in that. So I think answers are there but you have to step to it and not expect to be spoon fed these things. It makes assumptions about the audience.”

“The warnings [about the country falling apart] all out there, but for some reason they don’t get any traction,” Garland added. “[I wondered,] ‘Is it the polarization? Is it just that we are not able to absorb any information because of the position we’ve already taken?’ Hence, making a movie that pulls the polarization out of it.”

Civil War starred Kirsten Dunst, Wagner Moura, Cailee Spaeny, Stephen McKinley Henderson and Sonoya Mizuno and followed a group of journalists covering the final days of a second civil war.

View the original on The Hollywood Reporter →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.