The Jerusalem PostSaudi Arabia, US discuss regional de-escalation efforts amid Houthi attacksDaily MaverickLosing Agoa isn’t a catastrophe — a botched response from Pretoria could beZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFThe Hollywood ReporterDave Bautista Reveals He Gained 20 Pounds of Muscle for ‘God of War’ SeriesRFI 中文美国总统特朗普被无国界记者组织放进了“新闻自由掠夺者”的行列之中NU.nlOok jongste dochter van Brad Pitt schrapt officieel zijn achternaamSBS 뉴스대통령 여권번호까지…'1호기 탑승자' 정보 노출Straits Times SportEverton beat Newcastle to pile pressure on Matthias JaissleCollider6 Thriller Shows From the 2010s That Are Perfect From Start to FinishRFIGaza: avec un système bancaire à bout de souffle, les Palestiniens face à une crise de liquiditésSDP EspectáculosLenny Kravitz no viajaba en la aeronave que cayó en Florida; su equipo aclara los rumoresالشرقإريتريا تتهم الحزب الحاكم في إثيوبيا بالسعي لتبرير حرب ضدها
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Monday, November 2, 2026

Legal challenge to Australia's social media ban to start in High Court

Translate

Two days of hearings on a challenge to Australia's landmark social media ban for children will begin at the country's highest court on Tuesday.

In a major test of the world-leading policy, a digital rights group will argue that the ban for under-16s robs children of their right to free communication. A separate challenge launched by platform Reddit will be jointly heard.

Introduced last December, the ban is a key part of sweeping changes the Australian government has spearheaded in recent years on online safety.

Supporters say the ban protects children from harmful content but critics say it is too blunt an instrument and efforts should focus on improving online safety.

The constitutional challenge in Australia's High Court was filed by the Digital Freedom Project a few weeks before the ban started on 10 December last year. The group is lead by New South Wales parliamentarian John Ruddick.

Two teens who originally spearheaded the case, Noah Jones and Macy Neyland, have since withdrawn as plaintiffs though Jones is still expected to attend Tuesday's hearing.

Speaking about the legal challenge last November, Jones told the BBC that there were bad things online but a blanket ban for under-16s was not the right answer.

"We shouldn't be using the resources and money of these social media platforms to try to avoid fines from our government," he said.

"They should be using this money and resources to try to get rid of the predators and harmful content out there."

Reddit also launched a High Court challenge to the ban, arguing the policy has serious implications for privacy and political rights.

Communications Minister Anika Wells last year said the government would not be "intimidated by legal threats."

"We will not be intimidated by big tech. On behalf of Australian parents, we will stand firm," she said last November.

Under the ban, ten platforms - Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Reddit, Snapchat, X, Kick, Threads and Twitch - must take "reasonable steps" to ensure no one under 16 years old can access its site.

Platforms risk fines of up to A$99m (US$70m, £52m) for serious or repeated breaches, but since the ban started, no company has been fined.

View the original on BBC News →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.