ESPN DeportesNecaxa anuncia salida de DT Martín VariniESPNWeek 2 truths: Ohio State's big-game problem; Oregon and Oklahoma still haven't fixed thingsBBC NewsWatch: Match of the DayRTP Desporto"Traição" de Adzic impõe primeira derrota à Juventusוואלהשר החוץ של עומאן: נדחתה הפגישה האזורית שתוכננה להתקיים בסלאלהThe Jerusalem PostCould Iran’s regime collapse? Inside the Israeli assessment of Tehran’s future - analysisDaily MaverickLOCAL ELECTIONS 2026: Zille is targeting the ANC’s heartland in Joburg, but voters are doubtfulInquirerLotto results: No jackpot winner in Sept. 13 drawsRadio-CanadaUn compromis qui permet à Zachary Bolduc d’assurer son avenir pour quatre ansVanguardThere was FBI investigation but Tinubu not involved — OmokriComplete SportsLookman Features As Atletico Return To Winning Ways After 3-0 Win Against Sociedadn-tvZwei Touchdowns zum Start: Amon-Ra St. Brown eröffnet NFL-Saison in Höchstform
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Sunday, September 13, 2026

Carrick Slams Decision To Allow Haaland’s ‘Controversial’ Goal Stand

Translate

Michael Carrick has slammed the decision that cost Manchester United in their 1-0 defeat to Manchester City in Sunday’s Premier League derby at Old Trafford.

Carrick admitted he has been left ‘really worried’ after Erling Haaland’s winner was allowed to stand despite an offside Enzo Fernandez appearing to interfere with play.

The Norwegian scored the decisive goal for Enzo Maresca’s 10 men when Josko Gvardiol’s cross-cum-shot deflected towards the backpost where Haaland applied the finish.

Lisandro Martinez was between Fernandez and Haaland, but the Argentine launched himself towards the ball in an effort to convert a diving header. However, it was ruled that the former Chelsea man hadn’t interfere with play.

Haaland’s effort was initially chalked off for offside but after a lengthy check from the Video Assistant Referee, it was found that Patrick Dorgu had played the striker onside.

Carrick was left fuming by the decision to allow the goal to stand and subsequent explanation that Fernandez hadn’t impacted play despite being marked by his fellow countryman.

He said (via aol.co.uk): “Confused, not even confused, we’ve put things in place to help referees’ decisions, screens, referees in an office somewhere. It’s more worrying about if that’s the interpretation about football.

“If we’ve got people in place that are meant to understand the game of football or not interfering with play or impacting an attack, throwing your body at it with a defender next to him, it’s really worrying for me, if that’s how it’s interpreted.

Also Read: Carrick Merely An Interim Solution For Manchester United –Carragher

“It’s a staggering decision. I can’t understand it once I seen it then the explanation almost makes it worse. Well, the explanation that he’s not interfering with play. Incredible.

“It’s not going to change a season, it’s a major impact on the game and it’s a massive game. It’s a long season ahead, we’ve got to get back to winning football matches, that’s on us, that (decision) wasn’t on us today.”

City had been reduced to 10 men in the first-half when Phil Foden was sent off for violent conduct after kicking out at Bruno Fernandes. However, the Red Devils succumbed to another defeat while Maresca’s side maintained their 100 percent record.

View the original on Complete Sports

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.