CNN Türkİstanbul’da FETÖ operasyonu: 19 şüpheli gözaltına alındıBollywood HungamaBigg Boss 20: Qazi Touqeer recalls being labelled “arrogant” after turning down Ekta Kapoor’s TV offer in 2005: “Main chhota tha, 20 saal ka…”PunchWorld Anaesthesia Day: Doctors call for better equipment, fundingDaily MaverickWORLD FOOD DAY EDITORIAL: Hungry by design: hunger must be on the ballot on 4 NovemberRTP DesportoLiga Europa. Benfica goleia Celtic por 4-1The Jerusalem Post'We'll knock it out fast': Trump threatens Iran's Pickaxe Mountain nuclear site with strikesInquirer3 dead, 1 wounded in Negros Oriental town shootingESPNTransfer rumors, news: Arsenal eye January move for Bayern Munich defenderInquirer EntertainmentAl Pacino to get lifetime achievement award from the Screen Actors Guild한겨레10월17일 알림ZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-NachrichtenstudioUOLEm sabatina, Lula dá guinada sobre redução da maioridade penal
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Friday, October 16, 2026

1980 murder case: Allahabad HC finds two convicts were minors, remits matter to Juvenile Justice Board

Translate

Lucknow, The Allahabad High Court has set aside the sentences of two men convicted in a murder case 46 years ago after finding that both were minors at the time of the crime.

However, the Lucknow bench of the court upheld their conviction and referred the matter to the Juvenile Justice Board to determine the appropriate punishment.

A division bench of Justices Abdul Moin and Pramod Kumar Srivastava on Thursday passed the order on an appeal arising from the incident that took place in Sultanpur on September 28, 1980.

According to the prosecution, eight men attacked several persons with sharp-edged weapons and spears.

Four people - Shamshad, Abdul Rafiq, Dilsher and Hamidullah - were killed in the incident, while several others sustained injuries.

The sessions court had convicted all eight accused and sentenced them to life imprisonment on December 14, 1981.

During the pendency of their appeal in the high court, appellants Siraj Ahmad and Abdul Wahid claimed that they were minors when the incident occurred.

Following the high court's directions, the Juvenile Justice Board conducted an inquiry to ascertain their age.

Based on the board's report and educational records, the court found that Ahmad was 17 years and 10 months old, while Wahid was 17 years and 11 months old at the time of the crime.

While upholding their conviction, the bench observed that the testimonies of injured eyewitnesses and other witnesses were consistent with the medical evidence.

The prosecution had successfully established the charges, and there were no grounds to interfere with the findings of guilt.

However, the bench held that the sentences imposed under the criminal law could not be sustained in view of their juvenile status at the time of the offence.

The court observed that the two convicts could not be let off without any consequence, but the appropriate order had to be passed in accordance with the provisions of the juvenile justice law.

The bench directed both men to appear before the Juvenile Justice Board on October 28 along with a certified copy of the judgment. The board has been asked to pass an appropriate order within six weeks of receiving the certified copy.

This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

View the original on Hindustan Times →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.