InquirerSocratic method vs core skills? CJ contenders weigh bar exam reformsESPNEx-NBA player Beasley agrees to plead guilty in federal sports betting caseESPN Deportes¿Cómo regresa Tampa Bay de una desventaja de tres juegos?The Jerusalem PostArab parties Ra'am, Joint List soar to 17-18 seats amid high turnout, election exit polls showDaily MaverickThere is another Afrikaner story worth telling, rooted in reconciliation and a shared futureSCMP ChinaFor its autocratic African ally, Taiwan bites its tongue and opens its walletRai NewsSerie A, Roma-Cagliari 4-2 all' 87' e Torino-Como 1-0 dopo 45'ZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFEngadgetiPhone 18e reportedly comes with 2nm A20 chip and 60Hz screenANSASerie A: in campo Roma-Cagliari 2-2 e Torino-Como 1-0 DIRETTAABC News (Australia)Teen charged over Sydney house fire with 88yo woman insidePremium TimesNCGC guarantees N64.13bn loans to businesses, individuals
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Tuesday, October 27, 2026

Danny Masterson Loses Appeal of Rape Conviction

Translate

An appeals court has denied Danny Masterson‘s appeal of his 2023 conviction on rape charges, upholding the verdict and his 30-year prison sentence.

In an 89-page ruling, a three-judge panel rejected each of Masterson’s arguments in turn, including the claim that the trial judge was biased against Scientology.

Masterson, a star of “That 70s Show,” was found guilty of raping two women at his Hollywood Hills home in 2003. The jurors were unable to reach a verdict on a third count involving a former girlfriend who alleged she, too, was raped in 2001.

On appeal, his attorneys argued that Judge Charlaine Olmedo made a series of remarks and adverse rulings about Scientology that together infringed on his First Amendment rights. But the panel found that the judge’s statements showed “evidence no animus or departure from neutrality regarding Scientology.”

Olmedo allowed a former Scientologist to testify at the trial as an expert about the faith’s beliefs and practices. The prosecution argued that the victims — who all belonged to the church and had since left — delayed reporting the incidents or classifying them as rape due to fear of retaliation for violating a Scientology rule against going to the police.

Masterson’s lawyers objected and argued on appeal that the court had improperly intruded into interpretation of church doctrine.

“The jury in this case was not asked to determine the truth or falsity of Scientology doctrine or beliefs,” the appeals court concluded, citing the specific reasons for which the religious evidence was introduced. “Admission of Scientology evidence for those purposes did not contravene the First Amendment.”

The panel also rejected separate arguments about the statute of limitations and evidentiary rulings. The panel also summarily denied a separate habeas corpus petition that argued that Masterson did not get an adequate defense.

View the original on Variety →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.