ESPN DeportesPreguntas de temporada baja para los equipos eliminadosESPNAfter another playoff disappointment, what's next for Fever?The Jerusalem PostPrivacy law violated after data of 21,000 special education students leaked, Justice Ministry saysDaily MaverickPOWER CRISIS: Property owners spend millions on diesel as Joburg CBD power outages drive away tenantsZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFRTP DesportoMundial 2027: Francisco Neto pede Portugal fiel à identidade em LarneTagesschauMindestens 30 Tote bei russischen Angriffen auf Busse in der UkraineCBS NewsCurtis Flowers, wrongfully convicted man who was on death row, dies at 56EngadgetGoogle is doing away with Safety Signal on Pixel WatchGlobal NewsStelco begins issuing layoff notices as first job cuts set to take effect SundayBusiness AMJapan lanceert nieuwe onderzeeër en overweegt kernonderzeeërs als reactie op de maritieme uitbreiding van ChinaIl Sole 24 OrePensioni, in Italia solo il 21% di chi ha un patrimonio sotto i 250mila euro si sente preparato sul tema
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Thursday, October 8, 2026

Watch: What does the ruling mean for the investigation into the former prince?

Translate

The High Court has heard that search warrants used by Thames Valley Police to search Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's homes earlier this year were unlawful.

The force has said it accepted that the 'initial court's decision to issue warrants under the specific piece of legislation used was incorrect', before they searched the former prince's properties on 19 February.

Mountbatten-Windsor was arrested by Thames Valley Police on suspicion of misconduct in public.

He denies any wrongdoing. Special correspondent Lucy Manning is outside the High Court has and explains what we know about the ruling.

View the original on BBC News →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.