וואלהאח של מבוקש ניסה לחטוף ללוחם את נשקו - הכוחות ירו בו למוותThe Jerusalem PostUS officials prepare for chaos amid concerns Trump will try use federal power to swing midtermsCNN TürkGalatasaray, Barcelona maçı öncesi stadyum zeminini yeniliyorESPNZverev claims the US Open title amid a chaotic tournament -- and seasonPunchTrump declines appeal to pardon mother accused of killing three childrenInquirerWATCH: Sara Duterte impeachment trial | Sept. 15, 2026Bollywood HungamaSooraj Pancholi DENIES link to Disha Salian death case after CBI FIR names him alongside Aaditya Thackeray, Rhea Chakraborty: “Very unfair and extremely upsetting”Inquirer EntertainmentHundred Islands Film Fest draws top original films in Pangasinan한겨레초소형군집위성 등 15기 탑재 완료…누리호 다음달 우주로Egypt IndependentYemen’s Gate of Tears: How another critical waterway became Iran’s wild cardSözcü40 kişinin yaşadığı köyde bedava ev dağıtılıyorUOLLivro resgata o romance avassalador de Marcel Duchamp e Maria Martins
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Tuesday, September 15, 2026

QC court junks Sara Duterte’s bid to inhibit judge

Translate

Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte (L) walks with one of her lawyers Paul Lim (R) as she arrives at a court building to post bail in Quezon City suburban Manila on September 5, 2026, after a warrant of arrest was issued. A Philippine court on September 4 issued an arrest warrant for Vice President Sara Duterte over an alleged death threat against the country's president, with her defence team saying she would "exercise all her legal remedies".

AFP / Ted Aljibe

MANILA, Philippines — A Quezon City court has denied the Motion for Inhibition or Voluntary Recusal filed by Vice President Sara Duterte in her pending grave threats case.

In an order dated September 14, Quezon City Regional Trial Court Branch 98 rejected Duterte’s plea for "utter lack of merit."

Duterte’s legal team submitted the motion via electronic mail on September 10, alleging that the court showed "manifest partiality, bias, and favoritism."

The defense argued that the court assisted the prosecution in establishing probable cause by directing them to submit digital evidence omitted from the original filing.

The defense contended that the omission of digital evidence should have been fatal to the prosecution's case, asserting that the court should have determined probable cause solely based on the initial records and dismissed the charges immediately.

Additionally, Duterte’s camp alleged that undue preference was given to the prosecution on August 17, and argued that they were deprived of time to comment on the submission.

However, RTC Branch 98 rejected the claims, emphasizing that judicial independence and the presumption of regularity govern the court's actions.

"All told, absent any clear and convincing evidence of actual bias, prejudgment, or an improper connection that reasonably calls the undersigned's impartiality into question, the undersigned sees no cogent reason for her to inhibit or recuse herself from hearing these cases," the court ruled.

In a statement, Duterte’s lawyer, Paul Lawrence Lim, said that the vice president will exercise all legal remedies.

“The Vice President will exercise all available remedies. We also received the court’s order requiring both parties to strictly comply with the sub judice rule and to refrain from publicly discussing the merits of the case,” Lim said.

“We will continue to comply, consistent with the Vice President’s respect for the rule of law,” he added.

The grave threats charge stemmed from the threats uttered by Duterte against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., First Lady Liza Marcos, and detained former House Speaker Martin Romualdez.

The threats Duterte made during online press conferences in October and December 2024 also formed part of Article IV of the articles of impeachment against her.

RTC Branch 98 issued the arrest warrant on September 4, and Duterte posted bail the following day.

View the original on The Philippine Star

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.