PunchRefinery shares may hit N10,000 — DangoteThe Jerusalem PostRosh Hashanah 2026: Humor, the shofar, and the ability to accept the absurdity of lifeCNN TürkNepal'deki sel felaketinin faturası belli oldu! Buzul çökmesi tetikledi, milyarlarca dolarlık yıkım bıraktıInquirer EntertainmentAi-Ai delas Alas says she did not ask for ex Gerald Sibayan’s deportation from USInquirerGatchalian seeks localized class suspensions amid widespread disruptionsESPNTransfer rumors, news: Man United eye Bournemouth defender to replace Shawוואלהצעיר כבן 20 נפצע בינוני באירוע אלימות ברהטBollywood HungamaAmeesha Patel’s parents’ Mumbai home robbed, jewellery worth Rs 5 lakh reportedly stolenColliderRidley Scott's Most Divisive Sci-Fi Sequel Officially Conquers a New Streamer매일경제“일본이 5배? 우리는 7배 올린다”…中 일본인 비자 수수료 7~8배 인상HipertextualEstas son los 3 mejores motivos para comprarte el iPhone 18 Pro este añoThe RegisterThe aircraft might not be flying, but the certificate has gone on vacation
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Saturday, September 12, 2026

Disabled person left homeless for over a year after Hounslow Council housing application errors

Translate

WEST END FINAL

A West London council left a disabled person sofa surfing after failing to inform them that it had closed their homelessness application.

Hounslow Council has apologised for the mistake which left two people, referred to as X and Y in the report, homeless for over a year.

Despite one of the pair, named only as X, having an upcoming medical procedure at the time of the application which could put them at risk of infection, the council repeatedly lost track of their file and failed to provide legally required accommodation.

The pair initially contacted the local authority in February 2023 relating to their living conditions, and again in May, when they told the council they were officially homeless and sofa surfing.

A council officer promised to call back the following week – this never happened.

After months of silence, the council initiated their housing register application, however, the assigned housing caseworker to the pair had left the council by this point. Internal council documents indicated that officers tried to contact X and the other person, named as Y, between January and April 2024 about potential properties with no response.

However, the council was not able to produce evidence of these communications to the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman (LGSCO). In February, the new housing officer contacted X and Y who were still sofa surfing.

Three months later, the council closed their housing application citing lack of response from the pair – but did not notify them of this.

The Ombudsman determined that “X and Y remained in contact with the council about their homeless application”.

The report states: “It is also clear though the council accepted it had not transferred X and Y’s homeless application onto the new IT system at a time when X and Y’s caseworker also left.

“I therefore consider it likely it is those issues which resulted in lack of contact rather than any failure on the part of X and Y. In those circumstances I consider the council at fault for closing the homeless application.”

Throughout this period, friends of the couple confirmed with the council that they were staying with two different friends for a maximum of six nights per week, and in some cases only four nights per week.

The watchdog therefore determined that the council failed the pair in not providing them interim accommodation.

The council also failed to offer interim accommodation in 2024 – another fault. It took until June 2025 for the council to accept housing duty.

The couple were offered a property the council accepted was not suitable for their needs in October 2025 – yet it did not offer another property. The Ombudsman ordered Hounslow Council to pay the pair £1,000 for the distress caused.

The council were also told to contact X and Y to see if they still require housing.

A Hounslow Council spokesperson said: “The council is constantly striving to improve its performance, this includes having the appropriate regard for LGSCO findings.

“We have apologised to the complainant and have taken the agreed actions, including a review of guidance on when temporary accommodation should be offered and recording of why it has not been.”

View the original on Evening Standard

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.