InquirerMimaropa drug bust in Palawan yields ₱51,884 worth of ‘shabu’PunchMadrid apologise to Chinese people over Mbappé’s commentsThe Jerusalem PostIDF kills three terrorists in Gaza, including Hamas Nukhba who kidnapped Alexander Dancyg on Oct. 7Daily MaverickWHAT’S COOKING: Asparagus spears with rosemary-infused Parmesan butter creamESPNThe joy and pain that define baseball were in full force in Rays' incredible Game 4 winColliderMichael Bay’s ‘Black Hawk Down’ Replacement Officially Has a New Streaming BaseCapital FMRights groups sue State over alleged political violence ahead of 2027 pollsThe RegisterNeocloud thinks AI agents - not meatbags - will be its main customersZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFGhaflaLynn Ngugi Defends Mercy Masika’s Biblical Wife Masterclass Amid BacklashNHK 社会熊本地震3か月 イオン 一部エリア営業再開の意向 遺族に示すالنهارأستراليا تُشدّد الرقابة على مستحضرات الواقي من الشمس
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, October 28, 2026

Rhodes’ grave divides Zimbabweans as calls for removal grow

Translate

Calls for the removal of Cecil John Rhodes’ remains from Matobo Hills has sparked debate among Zimbabweans, with some supporting the move and others warning of its potential implications for tourism and local communities.

Speaking during the SADC Anti-Sanctions Day commemorations in Mutare, Chief Senator Mutasa said chiefs from his province were united in their demand for the former British imperialist’s remains to be removed.

“As chiefs of Manicaland, we are saying Rhodes’ bones must go,” he declared.

The remarks have drawn mixed reactions online, with questions raised about regional representation, colonial history and the economic value of the burial site.

One commenter, @Frank Bekezela Mpofu, argued that Matabeleland should not be conflated with Manicaland, while @Prince Sandile Vodloza questioned how Rhodes’ burial in Matobo affected people from the eastern province.

Others focused on the potential economic consequences of removing the remains.

“… that statue it can give us foreign currency, its a tourist attraction it create employment,” @Reggie Maf commented.

Another commenter, @Leonard Mazodze, similarly argued that the site attracts tourists and generates income.

However, some supported Mutasa’s position, with @Honesty Inno Chenjerai pointing to South Africa’s removal of Rhodes’ statue as evidence that colonial-era symbols can be reconsidered.

Who was Cecil John Rhodes?

Rhodes was a British businessman, mining magnate and politician who played a major role in British colonial expansion in southern Africa.

He founded the British South Africa Company, which was instrumental in the colonisation of territories that became Zimbabwe.

He also served as prime minister of the Cape Colony from 1890 to 1896.

Rhodes died in Cape Town on 26 March 1902.

According to South African History Online, he had requested in his will to be buried at World’s View in the Matobo Hills, where he was laid to rest in April that year.

His legacy remains controversial because of his imperial ambitions and the dispossession of African communities associated with colonial rule.

Tourism versus colonial legacy

Matobo Hills is a UNESCO World Heritage Site known for its distinctive granite formations, ancient rock art and cultural significance.

The dispute raises questions about how Zimbabwe should balance confronting its colonial past with preserving historical sites that may also support tourism.

In South Africa, the Rhodes Must Fall movement culminated in the removal of his statue at the University of Cape Town on 9 April 2015.

However, removing a statue and relocating human remains are different processes, and the latest call does not itself establish that Rhodes’ grave will be moved.

The debate continues to highlight differing views on how Zimbabwe should remember its past while considering the interests of communities connected to its heritage sites.

View the original on The South African →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.