Baby girl who died of meningitis would have probably survived if antibiotics were given earlier and doctors looked past Covid diagnosis, inquest jury hears

A five-month-old baby girl who died from meningitis in hospital probably would have lived if antibiotics were administered earlier and doctors had looked beyond their diagnosis of Covid, an expert has told an inquest jury. 

Baby Esta High died on November 2, 2023, following 'missed opportunities' at Leeds General Infirmary, Wakefield Coroner's Court heard on Thursday. 

Professor Simon Nadel agreed at the inquest into the infant death that the lost chances at the hospital 'more than minimally, negligibly or trivially' contributed to the death of Esta. 

Professor Nadel, a consultant in paediatric intensive care, gave expert evidence at the inquest into the death of Esta, whose parents say died because clinicians missed vital chances to spot her bacterial infection and start antibiotics - because they were convinced her symptoms were down to the Covid virus. 

The professor was taken through Esta's time at the hospital by assistant coroner Naomi McLoughlin. 

The inquest heard how she was taken into the emergency department by her parents, Lynsey Carr and Leon High, with a high temperature and vomiting on October 31, 2023. 

Baby Esta High (pictured with her mother, Lynsey Carr), died aged five months old on November 2, 2023 

Baby Esta's parents, Lynsey Carr and Leon High, described her as: 'bright, beautiful and perfect from the first moment'

The inquest jury has heard how Esta tested positive for Covid and was kept in the hospital because of concerns from her parents, despite staff wanting to send her home. 

The jury has heard how Esta was eventually given antibiotics on the evening of November 2 and was admitted to intensive care, but it was too late to save her. 

Professor Nadel was asked by Rachel Young, representing Esta's parents, whether blood cultures should have been taken when she arrived at the hospital as she presented as a risk of sepsis. 

He agreed with Ms Young that 'there was a missed opportunity on October 31 to comply with national guidelines for obtaining blood tests and blood cultures that materially contributed to the outcome in this case'. 

The professor also agreed that there were further missed opportunities 'to have saved Esta's life', beginning on the night of November 1 through to the morning of November 2. 

On each occasion, he said the observations on Esta should have resulted in a medical review by a senior doctor which, he believed, should have meant a re-diagnosis and the earlier starting of antibiotics.

Esta's parents said: 'When she arrived, she completed us' 

Wakefield Coroner's Court heard how there were 'missed opportunities' to save the infant at Leeds General Infirmary 

Ms Carr said she believed staff were more concerned with isolating Esta because of the Covid risk than listening to her parents

Professor Nadel was asked about a doctor's decision at about 8am on November 2 to continue to attribute Esta's symptoms to Covid and not go down a different diagnostic route which would have resulted in antibiotic treatment.

He agreed that this too 'more than minimally, negligibly or trivially contributed to Esta's death'.

The professor said that by midday on November 2, when Esta began showing clear signs of seizures, this was the point at which antibiotic intervention would probably have been too late.

Under questioning by Megan Crowther, for Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Professor Nadel admitted he had changed his opinion about when starting antibiotic treatment is likely to have led to a different outcome, compared to his previous statements.

But the professor said that this showed just how difficult it was to put a timescale on these judgments, stressing that the opinions he gave to the jury were 'on the balance of probabilities' - not certainties. 

He also stressed that the presence of Covid made decision-making more complicated for the doctors involved. 

The professor said: 'I have said all along that the earlier antibiotics were started the more likely that the outcome would have been different.' 

He concluded that his opinion was that the cause of Esta's death was pneumococcal meningitis, but agreed with the coroner that this was for the jury to formally determine. 

Last week, Ms Carr told the jury how her daughter was a 'happy, healthy, smiling girl' before she became ill on October 31. 

She explained how Esta's condition deteriorated in hospital but her and Mr High's concerns were repeatedly ignored by staff until it was too late. 

She said the family, from Leeds, were put in a side room at the hospital's children's assessment and treatment (CAT) unit, where she believed staff were more concerned with isolating Esta because of the Covid risk than listening to her parents.

Ms Carr said the family's concerns over her symptoms, some of which they captured on a video shown to the jury, were 'dismissed on multiple occasions'.

She told the jury: 'Unfortunately, as our daughter had been left untreated for 55 hours, it was too late to save our darling girl.'

Ms Carr said her daughter was 'bright, beautiful and perfect from the first moment' and 'when she arrived, she completed us'.