ESPN DeportesYankees con Mcmahon y Rice imponentes, toman ventaja en la serie ante RaysThe Jerusalem PostEight sailors assigned to USS Lincoln attempted suicide, Navy Secretary tells Congress한겨레사격 소승섭, 유도 김혜미…30~40대에 AG 첫 출전 ‘금’보다 값진 도전UOLAlagoas tem disputa de cardeais do antigo e do novo centrão em embate de Lira e Renan CalheirosHong Kong Free PressHong Kong slams EU report claiming ‘deterioration of fundamental freedoms’ in the city中国新闻网(长征胜利90周年)百件作品绘长征 广西美术作品联展回望革命历史PunchSenator facilitates market to boost commerce in Edo communityLenta.ruВ США заявили о готовности расширить торговое соглашение с КитаемMalay MailWoman found dead in Kuala Kangsar home, police arrest two suspects believed to be relativesLa NaciónFuror por Lizzie Borden: las principales diferencias entre la historia real y la serie Monster de NetflixGlobal NewsFrom meat to the saddle: B.C. rancher trains yaks to carry ridersEl ComercioDólar BCV HOY, miércoles 23 de setiembre: Tipo de cambio y tasa oficial en Venezuela
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Thursday, September 24, 2026

Lidl banned from selling copycat Birkenstock sandals, Dutch court rules

Translate

Lidl must stop selling copycat versions of Birkenstock's famous sandals in the Netherlands, a Dutch court has ruled.

The discount supermarket chain faces a fine of €5,000 (£4,200) per day for non-compliance and must also hand over sales data to Birkenstock, according to the ruling.

Lidl must also compensate Birkenstock and pay its legal fees, with the amount to be decided in separate court decisions.

Birkenstock said the judgement sent a clear message that "copycats must not be allowed to free-ride on [our] creativity and innovation". The BBC has reached out to Lidl for comment.

The ruling, which can still be appealed, means Lidl cannot sell its copycat versions of Birkenstock's Arizona, Madrid, Gizeh, Boston, and Florida models across the Netherlands, after the court found the discount grocer infringed on the brand's trademark "footbed design".

It is the latest in a string of court decisions on Birkenstock designs.

In November 2025, a Dutch court order stopped retailer Scapino from selling similar lookalikes, a judgment that is being appealed.

And in December 2025, Europe's highest court ruled that everyday commercial products can be protected by copyright if they reflect creative design choices, a decision that Birkenstock said was relevant to its "iconic" sandals.

However, Birkenstock also faced a setback in Germany's highest court in early 2025.

The sandals may have been cool enough for Margot Robbie to wear in the Barbie film, but the German judges ruled they were practical products rather than works of art – an outcome Birkenstock called a "missed opportunity" at the time.

Following Wednesday's ruling, Birkenstock said it will "continue to defend its rights vigorously and will use all available legal means to combat imitations of its iconic products".

"To protect its retail partners and consumers, Birkenstock will continue to take decisive action against copycats seeking to profit from the company's creative ideas and innovations," it added.

Birkenstock is far from the only fashion brand locked in battles with mass retailers over design mimicry.

Footwear giants like Dr. Martens have repeatedly taken online big-box sellers to court over boot designs, while luxury house Christian Louboutin spent years in global litigation defending its signature red soles against high-street copycats.

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.

Tags:  

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.

View the original on MyJoyOnline

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.