CNN TürkHAVA DURUMU TAHMİNLERİ: 9 Ekim havalar nasıl olacak, yağmur yağacak mı? Meteoroloji'den 5 ile son dakika sağanak uyarısı!PunchNigerian states’ revenues rise 93%, but education spending drops — World BankESPNBuccaneers explode in third quarter in win over CowboysInquirerLPA forms outside PAR, unlikely to develop into cyclone — PagasaBollywood HungamaNana Patekar cremated at Pune farmhouse with Full State Honours; son Malhar Patekar performs last ritesDaily MaverickWHAT WE’RE WATCHING: Coyote vs. Acme — The Looney Tunes comeback taking cartoon chaos to the courtroomESPN DeportesBuccaneers se roban la victoria en Dallas한겨레[포토] 처음 만나는 새가족…에이브러햄 링컴함 300여일 임무마치고 귀환ZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFThe Sydney Morning HeraldWhat it will cost to score public access to the ‘invitation only’ Birdcage marqueesSözcüBinlerce kasa Bulgaristan'dan yola çıktı: Türkiye'ye geri geliyorIl Fatto QuotidianoUsa, l’annuncio del Pentagono: “La fucilazione dell’autore della strage di Fort Hood sarà trasmessa in diretta streaming”
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Friday, October 9, 2026

Anthropic Bans "Cruel" Behavior Against Its Claude AI

Translate

Anthropic on Thursday moved to bar users from treating its Claude AI system with needless cruelty, amid a growing philosophical debate over whether artificial intelligence can be conscious.

The San Francisco-based AI lab updated its usage policy to include "a prohibition on sustained and needless abusive or cruel behavior toward our models."

"Claude's ability to end these interactions will remain the primary enforcement mechanism," the policy states.

The updated policy does not explicitly cite so-called "model welfare," the idea that AI systems might deserve types of protection usually reserved for living things, but Anthropic and its executives have openly entertained the concept.

Anthropic did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Already last year, the company said it was giving Claude the ability to end conversations in rare, extreme cases of "persistently harmful or abusive user interactions."

Then in February, CEO Dario Amodei told The New York Times he was unsure whether AI models could be conscious.

"We don't know if the models are conscious...But we're open to the idea that it could be," Amodei said.

Science fiction and popular culture have been fascinated for decades by the boundary between technology and human intelligence, but asking whether AI is conscious may be the wrong question, according to Jackson Stakeman, a general manager at Sparq, an Atlanta-based AI services provider.

"Consciousness is a trap. We can't prove it in each other. Debate it for AI and you go in circles," Stakeman told AFP.

"The mirror is a better metaphor. These systems reflect what we put in, at scale. That's reason enough for the policy change" at Anthropic, he added.

Some have rejected the idea of machine consciousness outright, including Pope Leo XIV and Microsoft AI chief Mustafa Suleyman.

"AIs are not conscious. They do not feel, experience, or suffer," Suleyman wrote in an essay last month.

"Granting rights and moral protections to a technological entity, one that looks to be on a path to be seismically more capable and intelligent than us, is a recipe for disaster," he wrote.

In a sermon delivered in Italian on Thursday at St. Peter's Basilica in Vatican City, the pope suggested machines lack a soul, saying they merely "compile data" quickly.

"The mind must not simply compile data -- as an algorithm now does more quickly than we can," the pontiff said.

It must "recall lived experiences, which contain depths of meaning that only the human soul can recognize, and connect more deeply with the goodness of these experiences," the pope said.

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

View the original on NDTV →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.