InquirerSt. Luke’s Medical Center reports personal data breachThe Jerusalem PostIDF begins upgrading Gaza border barrier with new technology, infrastructurePunchState police: 28 assemblies approve, Tinubu’s assent nextDaily MaverickBOOK EXCERPT: Scorpio Rising — The latest thriller from SA’s master of crime fiction한겨레North Korea says it has ‘no need to sit face to face with’ USVarietyKaren Bass and Nithya Raman in Tight Race for L.A. Mayor in Early ReturnsZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-NachrichtenstudioSözcüABD'liler sandıkta mesajı verdi: Trump hezimete uğradıAntara NewsRSPO claims certified concessions have less fire damageDaily MailGOP stares down horrific midterms night as Democrats flip four critical Senate seats: Live updatesBBC News BrasilAnálise: Partido Democrata toma territórios republicanos com vitórias históricasTagesschauUS-Zwischenwahl: Demokraten erobern Mehrheit im Senat
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, November 4, 2026

Trump’s Supreme Court winning streak in election cases screeches to a halt

Translate
The U.S. Supreme Court's justices acted with remarkable speed to shut down President Donald Trump's attempt to intervene in California's ballot count on the eve of Tuesday's midterm elections.

The U.S. Supreme Court's justices acted with remarkable speed to shut down President Donald Trump's attempt to intervene in California's ballot count on the eve of Tuesday's midterm elections. | REUTERS

Nov 4, 2026

WASHINGTON – Six hours and 24 minutes. That is how long it took the U.S. Supreme Court’s justices to shut down President Donald Trump’s attempt to intervene in California’s ballot count on the eve of Tuesday’s midterm elections.

Usually, the institution takes its time with decisions — mostly over months but even in emergency actions, over weeks — but on Monday, the justices acted with remarkable speed. They gave the administration’s case the same kind of unceremonious treatment sometimes exhibited in matters they apparently deem unworthy of the top U.S. judicial body’s attention.

The court’s decision to deny the administration’s request to temporarily block California from counting mail-in ballots from more than 20,000 registered voters who federal officials allege are likely non-U.S. citizens came in a brief, one-sentence order. The court offered no explanation for its decision, and there were no publicly noted dissents among the justices.

In a time of both misinformation and too much information,
quality journalism is more crucial than ever.
By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.

View the original on The Japan Times →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.