ESPN24-team CFP on table as ESPN window to openESPN DeportesTeoscar Hernández da triunfo a Skubal y DodgersPunchBank mourns as branch manager killed by kidnappers in Imoוואלהמשמרות המהפכה: תקפנו 2 כלי שיט אמריקניים ו-8 מיכליות נפטThe Jerusalem PostPlaying politics with security: Jerusalem must review UK privileges amidst sanctions - editorialInquirerImpeach court revisiting ‘2/3’ conviction ruleBollywood HungamaHanuman Ansh team meets Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath amid box office triumph한겨레[단독] ‘인권위 불법침입’ 송치 윤일병 유족 등 13명, 2년10개월 만에 ‘혐의 없음’SözcüPiyasalarda fırtına öncesi sessizlik: Altın fiyatlarının kaderini değiştirecek veri geliyor!Sky TG24Guerra Ucraina Russia, Putin a Trump: “Non colpirò l’Europa”. LIVEThe South AfricanRassie confirms when Pollard will return for SpringbokstazDie Wahrheit: Nur ein Snack
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, September 9, 2026

US accuses Chinese AI firms of ‘malicious’ copying of AI technology

Translate

US accuses Chinese AI firms of ‘malicious’ copying of AI technology

The Chinese companies copied US AI labs’ intellectual property through a technique known as distillation, US law enforcement and intelligence officials say

AT A GLANCE

  • The US government accused Chinese AI companies of maliciously copying technology from American firms, complicating diplomatic relations ahead of a meeting between US and Chinese leaders.
  • US officials claimed six Chinese companies, including Alibaba, used a technique called distillation to replicate American AI models, likely with the knowledge of the Chinese government.
  • The allegations suggest that this technology theft not only reduces costs for Chinese firms but also enhances China's military and cyber capabilities, posing a potential threat to the US and its allies.

This is AI-generated. Read the article for full context. Report any errors.

WASHINGTON, USA – The US government on Tuesday, September 8, accused Chinese artificial intelligence companies of maliciously copying technology from American AI firms, potentially complicating relations ahead of a planned meeting between leaders of the world’s two biggest economies later this month.

The Chinese companies copied US AI labs’ intellectual property through a technique known as distillation, according to a statement from US law enforcement and intelligence officials. Distillation is the process of training smaller AI models using output from larger, more expensive ones as part of an effort to lower the costs of training a new AI tool.

US officials accused six Chinese companies, including DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and Alibaba, of tapping variants of American-made AI models to train their AI products more quickly. The companies did so “likely with Chinese government awareness,” according to the statement from US officials, who added that the Chinese companies targeted AI models from Anthropic, OpenAI, Alphabet’s Google, and SpaceX.

“China-based AI companies are engaging in aggressive, malicious and targeted distillation activities at an industrial scale,” the officials said.

US officials made the allegations as the administration of President Donald Trump prepares for Chinese President Xi Jinping’s visit to the US in late September. The US and China are also gearing up to discuss AI safety risks during a dialogue planned for mid-September, Reuters previously reported.

The Chinese embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the distillation allegations.

The US made a similar accusation in April ahead of Trump’s visit to Beijing.

The Tuesday statement alleged that the distillation not only reduces research and development costs for Chinese AI firms, but also enhances China’s “military and cyberattack capabilities that could be used against the US and our allies.”

Reuters reported on July 31 that Chinese military researchers have used outputs from leading US AI models to train domestic Chinese AI systems and advance China’s defense capabilities. – Rappler.com

View the original on Rappler

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.