RTP DesportoLiga Europa. Torreense defronta Sunderland esta quinta-feira em LeiriaPunchPlayers like me, Yamal, Álvarez need more protection from referees – Vini JrESPNTransfer rumors, news: Martínez's future at Man United in doubt after bust-upThe Jerusalem PostRetired US military officers urge government to cancel livestream of Fort Hood shooter's executionDaily MaverickWHAT’S COOKING: Lemony Greek roast chicken and potatoesCNN TürkYönetmelik değişti! Taksitli alışverişte yeni dönemBollywood HungamaBREAKING: Jailer 2 ends with the promise of third part; Hrithik Roshan's massy special appearance has a Chulbul Pandey connection (Spoilers ahead)InquirerNBI chief dares Sara Duterte’s camp to file case over bias claimsZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-NachrichtenstudioUOLSão Paulo deve ter chuva forte nesta quinta (15) após temporal matar uma pessoa na vésperaBusiness AMChina stuurt vliegdekschip Liaoning naar de westelijke Stille Oceaan, in de buurt van Japan en TaiwanSRF NewsNachfolge von Guy Parmelin – SVP-Nationalrätin Céline Amaudruz will Bundesrätin werden
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Thursday, October 15, 2026

Supreme Court says person converting from Hinduism to Islam can’t claim ‘backward’ quota

Translate

The Supreme Court on Thursday held that social backwardness of a person can't be transferred from the Hindu social order to a non-Hindu social order after he converts to another religion.

A bench of Justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Shree Chandrashekhar dismissed Tamil Nadu government's plea against the Madras High Court order, which held that a person converting to Islam can't claim reservation under Backward Class (Muslim) category solely on the basis of conversion.

While upholding the high court order, which had quashed the Tamil Nadu government's notification to grant reservation to converted Muslims, the top court said it called for no interference.

On August 7, the top court had reserved its decision on the plea moved by the state government against the high court verdict.

The state government's appeal said the impugned judgment gives rise to substantial questions concerning the permissible scope of interference with executive policy framed pursuant to the recommendation of an expert statutory commission.

View the original on Mint →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.