The Jerusalem PostSwitzerland looking at Barak MX, SAMP/T NG for missile defensePunchNSCDC suspends officer over Abuja market shootingESPNTransfer rumors, news: Everton eye loan for Man United's RashfordBollywood HungamaBhumi Pednekar reunites with Akshay Kumar for Priyadarshan’s next comedyCNN TürkMuğla'da askeri gemiler ziyarete açıldıZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFSBS 뉴스'다문화 가정 정책' 논란 커지자…이 대통령 직접 반박NHK 社会浜岡原発地震データ問題で原子力規制委が不正防止対策導入決定سكاي نيوز عربيةالشرطة ترد على الليكود.. ما أدلة "سرقة الانتخابات"؟Golem.dePico11: Dieses Windows 11 passt auf eine CD-ROMn-tvErster World-Series-Titel: Brewers-Ekstase vor der großen Winter-Depression im BaseballGMA NewsMagnitude 5.6 earthquake hits off Surigao del Sur
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Thursday, October 29, 2026

SC clears ex-principal of grave misconduct for cutting trees: No proof

Translate

MANILA, Philippines—The Supreme Court has reduced the offense and the penalty meted on a former public school principal in San Jose, Occidental Mindoro over an unauthorized cutting of trees.

The high tribunal, in a decision on June 2 released only on Thursday, partially granted the petition sought by Melencio Corpuz.

Corpuz was found guilty of grave misconduct, simple neglect of duty, and simple misconduct by the Office of the Ombudsman and, later, by the Court of Appeals.

Article continues after this advertisement

The ex-principal of Bagong Sikat Elementary School and San Jose Pilot Elementary School was accused of selling parts of the cut trees for use as teachers’ cabinets, as firewood to a local bakery, and as charcoal for sale and personal use. 

FEATURED STORIES

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

The Supreme Court, however, cleared Corpuz of grave misconduct because the evidence was insufficient to prove that he pocketed funds or had any other form of personal gain when he ordered the cutting of trees on school property.

It was particularly referring to the statement by the local bakery that it bought wood from Corpuz for P2,800. 

“The statement from (the bakery) does not, by and of itself, prove that Corpuz personally received the proceeds and appropriated them for himself,” read part of the 13-page ruling. 

“At most, it merely established that (the bakery) purchased cut trees from the school on three occasions, and that the transactions were made with Corpuz,” it stated.

Article continues after this advertisement

The decision added that the bakery was “silent” on what happened to the funds after the sale, whether it was deposited to the school or whether the ex-principal pocketed them.

No other paper trail, such as receipts or audit reports, were presented to confirm the allegations.

Article continues after this advertisement

The high court, instead, affirmed Corpuz’s conviction only for simple neglect of duty and simple misconduct.

This promulgation also reduced the penalty to a six-month suspension, instead of dismissal.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.

Your subscription has been successful.

His fine may also be converted equivalent to Corpuz’s salary for six months, if he was no longer in service. /apl

View the original on Inquirer →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.