CNN TürkCAT31! Kedinin gözünden COP31 ZirvesiPunchChina accuses US of using spy claims to justify tech blockadeBollywood HungamaKareena Kapoor Khan faces legal notice over Quranic verse on 30-carat emerald pendant worn for Diwali 2026The Jerusalem PostWhy India and Israel still need an economic deal - opinionInquirerCops seize P16-M shabu in Zamboanga Sibugay raidUOLIrlanda sofre pressão para barrar envio à Rússia de matéria-prima militarSeeking AlphaHigh Liner Foods declares CAD 0.175 dividendFutura SciencesTasmanie : l’île australienne où la Terre raconte 500 millions d’années d’histoireVilaWebLa consellera Parlon titlla de “quatre arreplegats facinerosos” els participants en els aldarulls a BarcelonaOnetŻołnierz nakrzyczał na Pete'a Hegsetha i jego ludzi. Nie zachowali należytej powagiPremium TimesGovernor sacks task force over building demolitionTVN24Rosja ma problem z niedźwiedziami. Coraz więcej ataków
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Thursday, November 12, 2026

Abhinav Bindra Seeks Clarity Over IOA Election Rules, Makes Letter Public

Translate

Olympic champion Abhinav Bindra has made public a letter he sent to the Indian Olympic Association (IOA), reiterating concerns over what he described as an inconsistency between the body's Constitution and the rules governing the election of Sportspersons of Outstanding Merit (SOM) representatives. In a statement posted on X on Thursday, Bindra said the constitutional issue he had raised remained unresolved despite approaching IOA president PT Usha and CEO Raghuram Iyer ahead of the elections. Explaining his decision to release the correspondence, Bindra said the letter had entered the public domain and was being cited in media reports, prompting him to share the full text to provide clarity and context.

Unfortunately, my private correspondence with the Indian Olympic Association has found its way into the public domain. Given the references to it in recent media reports, I thought it appropriate to share my letter of 31 October 2026 in its entirety, so that its intent and context are clear. The letter was written before the elections, in a spirit of constructive engagement and with the larger interests of Indian sport at heart. I had raised a specific question concerning an apparent inconsistency between the IOA Constitution and the electoral rules. While I received an indication of which rules were being followed, the underlying constitutional question remained unanswered. To date, I have received no substantive clarification from either the Electoral Officer or the IOA leadership. My intention was never to question individuals or influence an electoral outcome. It was, and remains, to encourage greater clarity, transparency and confidence in our institutions. I have always believed that the strength of an institution lies not in the absence of questions, but in its willingness to address them. As India looks towards an increasingly ambitious future in world sport, the credibility of our institutions will be just as important as the achievements of our athletes. Strong governance is not merely an administrative necessity; it is the foundation upon which lasting sporting progress is built. My sincere hope is that we move forward with a shared commitment to constitutional clarity, fairness and integrity in all our institutional and electoral processes. These principles must never depend on individuals or outcomes. Ultimately, the credibility of our sporting institutions rests not merely on the decisions they make, but on the fairness and integrity of the processes through which those decisions are reached. Indian sport deserves nothing less.

— Abhinav A. Bindra OLY (@Abhinav_Bindra) November 12, 2026

"Unfortunately, my private correspondence with the Indian Olympic Association has found its way into the public domain. Given the references to it in recent media reports, I thought it appropriate to share my letter of October 31, 2026, in its entirety, so that its intent and context are clear," Bindra wrote.

He emphasised that the letter was sent before the elections and was intended to seek clarification on the interpretation of the IOA's governing framework.

"The letter was written before the elections, in a spirit of constructive engagement and with the larger interests of Indian sport at heart. I had raised a specific question concerning an apparent inconsistency between the IOA Constitution and the electoral rules."

"While I received an indication of which rules were being followed, the underlying constitutional question remained unanswered. To date, I have received no substantive clarification from either the Electoral Officer or the IOA leadership," he added.

The issue concerns Article 3.7 of the IOA Constitution and the recently notified rules governing the election of SOM representatives. Under the process, an 80-member roster is prepared by the Electoral Officer through a 10-tier eligibility system, with eight representatives (four men and four women) elected to the IOA General Assembly.

Bindra, who had already decided not to contest the election, stressed that his concerns were unrelated to his personal prospects or the fortunes of any candidate.

"My intention was never to question individuals or influence an electoral outcome. It was, and remains, to encourage greater clarity, transparency and confidence in our institutions. I have always believed that the strength of an institution lies not in the absence of questions, but in its willingness to address them," he said.

The former shooter also linked the issue to India's broader ambitions in global sport, arguing that strong governance must go hand in hand with athletic success.

"As India looks towards an increasingly ambitious future in world sport, the credibility of our institutions will be just as important as the achievements of our athletes. Strong governance is not merely an administrative necessity; it is the foundation upon which lasting sporting progress is built," Bindra stated.

The SOM elections, held on November 9, drew significant attention after PT Usha finished fifth in the women's category, with Anju Bobby George, Rani Rampal, Dola Banerjee and Saina Nehwal securing the four available positions.

Former sprinter Ashwini Nachappa has also alleged that external pressure led some candidates to withdraw from the race, while Usha has raised concerns over alleged campaigning violations and sought an independent review of the process from the International Olympic Committee (IOC).

Against that backdrop, Bindra called for electoral and administrative processes to be guided by principles that remain consistent regardless of individuals or outcomes.

"My sincere hope is that we move forward with a shared commitment to constitutional clarity, fairness and integrity in all our institutional and electoral processes. These principles must never depend on individuals or outcomes."

"Ultimately, the credibility of our sporting institutions rests not merely on the decisions they make, but on the fairness and integrity of the processes through which those decisions are reached. Indian sport deserves nothing less," he added.

The IOA Executive Council elections are scheduled to be held on December 5.

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

Featured Video Of The Day

India Ends CWG Boxing Campaign With Record-Breaking Seven Gold Medals

View the original on NDTV Sports →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.