ESPN DeportesAmérica está a una firma de fichar a Carlos Álvarez; hay acuerdo con LevanteESPNGraziano's bold-but-realistic predictions for all 32 NFL teams: Don't be surprised if ...The Jerusalem PostChinese President Xi Jinping arrives in Cairo for meeting with Egypt President Abdul Fattah al-Sisiוואלהסעודיה: איראן תקפה ספינה סעודית במצר הורמוזDaily MaverickFINAL CHAPTER: Soccer’s Messi era nears its end after superstar’s international retirementVilaWebEl cap de la policia espanyola diu que cap informe no atribueix al Marroc la planificació o l’execució de l’entrada a CeutaVanguardDangote: FG’s reforms restore investor confidence, put Nigeria on recovery pathسكاي نيوز عربيةنتنياهو من غزة: سنبقى حتى نزع سلاح حماسVarietyBlackpink and ‘White Lotus’ Star Lisa Documentary ‘Always Lalisa’ Sets Global ReleaseBBC News BrasilPor que caso Moraes é crise 'sem precedentes' no STF — e o que pode acontecer agora com o ministroSportstarPierre-Emerick Aubameyang quits Gabon after AFCON humiliationGlobal NewsCost of living, fuel has Couche-Tard customers cutting back on snacks
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, September 2, 2026

‘A grant is not a pension’: Sharp comeback stuns fellow pensioners

Translate

A heated exchange on The South African’s Facebook page took an unexpected turn after one grant recipient delivered a sharp rebuttal that reframed an entire debate over grant priorities. Yolanda Baart questioned why so many South Africans appear to misunderstand basic retirement planning, then delivered her central point: a SASSA grant, funded by taxpayers, is not the same as a pension built from a worker’s own salary deductions.

Her comment implied that conflating the two, treating a means-tested state grant as an entitlement equivalent to a contribution-based pension, misrepresents how both systems actually function, and undercuts genuine arguments about funding priorities.

Debate over grant priorities turns personal

Baart’s rebuttal was aimed at a proposal from fellow commenter Liz Esselen Beetge, who argued that stopping the Child Support Grant and the Social Relief of Distress grant would free up more money for pensioners.

Fellow commenter Ruguya Ramjam had backed the idea, replying, “So true, man.” But that agreement was short-lived once Baart’s pointed distinction landed in the thread, shifting the conversation from “who deserves more” to “what these grants actually are.”

Pension isn’t a pension, argues another user

Beetge’s response to the rebuttal was brief and difficult to parse, a short, near-illegible reply that offered no real counterargument. The exchange fizzled there, but it left a clear marker in the thread: not every grant recipient sees eye to eye on how state resources should be limited, and the distinction between a “grant” and a “pension” remains a genuine point of confusion for many.

As living costs keep climbing, debates like this one are likely to keep surfacing, particularly as pensioners look for someone or something to blame for the shrinking value of their grants. For now, the disagreement stands as a reminder that solving one group’s shortfall by cutting another’s support rarely earns unanimous support, even among people who otherwise agree that the system needs fixing.

Win R2 000 in the South African SASSA grant survey

If you receive a SASSA grant and want to share your story, we want to hear from you.

Take part in our survey and stand a chance to win R2 000. Your responses help us tell the stories that matter.

View the original on The South African

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.