InquirerPalace defends 27-year-old biology major given high post in poverty bodyESPNShai Gilgeous-Alexander tallies 32 points in Thunder's win over SpursESPN Deportes76ers ganan en MSG: Qué debes saber del debut de LeBronDaily MaverickINQUEST: Anele Tembe could ‘climb over balcony’ despite cocaine and alcohol toxicology evidence, inquiry hearsThe Jerusalem PostMaccabi Tel Aviv basketball rolls to 116-89 victory as Hapoel Jerusalem, Tel Aviv secure wins한겨레이재오 “김태규·이진숙·주진우 철없어…싸움부터 배워서야”ZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-NachrichtenstudioCNN TürkGözler Merkez'de! Kritik karar yarın açıklanacak경향신문[르포] “이번엔 가스관 내려올 것” 기대하는 주민들…“한국은 투자 말라”는 알래스카 어부SportstarAsian Para Games 2026 Medal Tally LIVE, Day 5: India wins three gold medals in athleticsMalay MailAI for the factory floor: Singapore rolls out S$45m boost for smaller firmsSözcü‘Tesadüfen yaşıyoruz’ dedirten ölüm
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, October 21, 2026

CJP's Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka move Delhi HC; cases handed to Crime Branch

Translate

CJP's Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka move Delhi HC; cases handed to Crime Branch

Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka have approached the Delhi High Court to challenge their judicial custody.

NEW DELHI: CJP's Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka Tuesday approached Delhi HC challenging their judicial custody, a day before the special executive magistrate decides whether to extend their custody.The two were detained on Oct 13 after they climbed a gate to enter Jantar Mantar, which has been denotified as a protest site, to protest against SIR. They have since spent 7 days in custody - initial five days, followed by a two-day extension that expires on Wednesday. Meanwhile, police have transferred the Oct 13 cases against them to Crime Branch.Das and Ranka have sought an urgent hearing, but the court is closed for Dussehra.

If the executive magistrate releases them Wednesday, their petition will become redundant.However, until late Tuesday, the court’s cause list didn’t have any case listed for hearing this week. However, sources said a call will be taken Wednesday if urgent listing has to be permitted and a vacation bench assembled for the same.In their petition, the two said their two-day remand violated the legal procedure and their ‘Right to Liberty’ under Article 21 of the Constitution.

They continue to remain in custody for six days despite submitting the required sureties multiple times, it said.“The mandatory procedure under Section 140 BNSS was not followed for rejecting the surety, showing complete misapplication of the law in the impugned order. That delay and obstruction in the acceptance and verification of sureties frustrates the very purpose of release,” the plea said.

The plea further argues that restricting the petitioners’ liberty in the interest of public order requires a “proximate and real nexus with disturbance of public order” and not a remote possibility, pointing out that the issue of protest at a denotified site is, at its highest, a question of regulation, not a threat to public order.

View the original on Times of India →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.