ESPNSmith to Heisman voters after record day: 'I'm the best player in the country'ESPN DeportesEN VIVO: Tala Rangel entierra las opciones de México por la remontadaEl ComercioJhon Atachagua va por su revancha en la ASICS Golden Run: “El año pasado quedé en segundo lugar, ahora quiero la medalla de oro”매일경제외국인 지난달 코스피서 20조 매도에…삼전닉스 외인 비중 연중 최저로ZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFSouth China Morning PostNew AI laws should target data governance, safety to build public confidence: expertsBusiness AMBusiness AM Sudoku’s 04-10-2026경향신문연근은 조림만? 제철 연근, 아삭하게 먹는 법Rappler[Vantage Point] The road to plenty: Four titans and the battle for the Santa Rosa pesoالنهارأسلحة الليزر في الدفاع الجوي الخليجي... حسنات وعوائقScreen RantAbsolute Green Lantern Just Set Up The Return Of DC's Most Surreal SuperheroNew Straits TimesBosnia votes as wartime divides drive campaigns
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Sunday, October 4, 2026

Bitchat removed from Apple's India app store after Centre's demand: Dorsey amid anti-EC stir

Translate

Twitter founder Jack Dorsey said on Saturday that the Indian government has removed his Bluetooth-based messaging app Bitchat’s access to the country’s citizens. This is the second time Dorsey is accusing the government of blocking Bitchat after the protests in July when the popularity of the app surged during protests at Delhi’s Jantar Mantar, where mobile internet services were suspended.

“Government of India officially removes bitchat from the App Store,” Dorsey wrote on X, sharing a screenshot of an email he received from Apple. A similar order is believed to have been received by Google to restrict the app’s access on Play Store.

According to people aware of the matter, the order received from the Union ministry of electronics and information technology (MeitY) sought to withhold the app in India for three days.

Also Read | 12-hour internet shutdown ordered at Jantar Mantar amid protest against CEC Gyanesh Kumar

The move comes amid protests in several cities demanding the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar over alleged problems in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. People aware of the matter told HT that the government is of the view that the app’s features may potentially be misused for anonymous coordination, unlawful assemblies, and organized criminal activities.

Bitchat had earlier become a lifeline for demonstrators, when in July, when mobile internet was repeatedly suspended around Jantar Mantar during the Cockroach Janta Party’s (CJP) protest demanding the resignation of the then education minister Dharmendra Pradhan. Protesters used the app to stay connected to people within Bluetooth range, typically a few dozen metres, as authorities suspended mobile internet services. Similar curbs were rolled out this past week. On October 2, during student-organised protests against Gyanesh Kumar, the government shut down the internet for 12 hours, from 9am to 9pm, within a 1.5-km radius of Jantar Mantar.

Also Read | 500+ detained, internet cut, clips from police buses: High drama in Delhi as Jantar Mantar sees protests again

The document posted by Dorsey to back his allegation against the Indian government was an email sent by Apple’s App Review team, which stated: “per demand from the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), [Bitchat] will be removed from the India App Store because it includes content that is illegal in India, which is not in compliance with the App Review Guidelines.”

According to the email, MeitY issued the takedown demand under Section 69(a) of the Information Technology Act.

The Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF), an advocacy organisation, on Saturday termed the removal of BitChat from the App Store “unconstitutional”.

“Section 69A permits the blocking of unlawful information, not of a messenger for working during internet shutdowns,” it said in a post on X, demanding the MeitY to publish the blocking order and to withdraw the direction.

Also Read | ‘Jantar Mantar 2.0 on October 10 if….’: Dipke's fresh CJP protest warning against CEC Gyanesh Kumar amid SIR row

To be sure, orders under section 69A are confidential in nature.

IFF argued that the app has no servers and hosts no content of its own. “What travels through it is the private speech of its users, so the claim that the application ‘includes’ illegal content is incoherent,” it said.

View the original on Hindustan Times →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.