PunchTinubu tackled Nigeria’s economic challenges with courage — APC campaign councilThe Jerusalem PostIran seals restaurants over allegations businesses ‘failed to observe Islamic norms’VarietyDavid Walliams, Former ‘Britain’s Got Talent’ Judge, Accused of ‘Grooming Fans’ and ‘Harassing Women’ After Failing to Get InjunctionZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFWirtualna PolskaOhydne słowa pani doktor po zamachu. KUL zwolnił wykładowczynięالشرقCOP31.. دعوات للتحول إلى الكهرباء لمواجهة تغير المناخ وتقلبات الطاقةNU.nlMoerdijkers voorzichtig positief over behoud van dorp, maar willen garantiesVilaWebFeijóo promet de reformar el reglament del congrés espanyol perquè no s’hi parli catalàCBS NewsCalifornia voters reject billionaire wealth tax, CBS News projectsDigital SpyBREAKING: David Walliams accused of sexual misconduct with girls as young as 15Capital FMWHO warns poor health data systems could delay lifesaving interventions across AfricaIl Fatto QuotidianoSevergnini show a La7: “Renzi il più grande talento politico degli ultimi 15 anni”. E tira fuori Recoba e gli agricoltori cremonesi che lo rimpiangono
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Tuesday, November 10, 2026

Najib’s house arrest: What did the AGC ask the High Court to clarify today?

Translate
Former Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Razak is pictured at the Kuala Lumpur High Court Complex on November 10, 2026. — Picture by Yusof Isa

Former Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Razak is pictured at the Kuala Lumpur High Court Complex on November 10, 2026. — Picture by Yusof Isa

By Malay Mail

First Published: Tuesday, 10 Nov 2026 7:33 PM MYT

Last Modified: Tuesday, 10 Nov 2026 7:42 PM MYT

KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 10 — The Attorney General’s Chambers (AGC) today sought to ensure that Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s house arrest arrangements explicitly provided for his return to Kajang Prison on August 24, 2028, to serve his separate 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) prison sentence.

In its written application, the prosecution requested that the High Court replace a November 6 discharge order with new terms clarifying Najib’s remaining SRC International sentence and his subsequent imprisonment in the 1MDB case.

The application specified that Najib should “be transferred back to Kajang Prison on August 24, 2028, to serve the sentence imposed on him in the 1MDB case”.

It also sought to specify that his SRC sentence would end on August 23, 2028, with his return to prison subject to any court order then in force.

The prosecution said the 1MDB prison sentence had been directed to begin once his SRC sentence ended, arguing that “the end date of the SRC sentences must be stated with certainty”.

It explained that Najib’s payment of the RM50 million fine on November 6 discharged his liability for the fine and imprisonment for non-payment, but did not extinguish his remaining SRC prison sentence.

The AGC also argued that the earlier discharge order, which used a standard form for release upon payment of a fine, could be interpreted as releasing Najib from his remaining SRC sentence altogether.

Citing provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code governing imprisonment warrants, the prosecution said there was an urgent need for a clear order in accordance with the law.

High Court grants AGC’s application

High Court judge Datuk Aslam Zainuddin subsequently granted the prosecution’s application, setting aside the November 6 discharge order and allowing Najib to serve the remainder of his SRC sentence under house arrest until August 23, 2028.

According to Bernama, Judge Aslam said the court would replace the earlier order “entirely with the order sought in this application”.

The new order also provides for Najib’s return to Kajang Prison on August 24, 2028, to serve his separate 1MDB sentence, Bernama reported.

At the hearing, Najib’s lead counsel Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah had argued that the original discharge order was already clear, as the RM50 million fine required under the conditional royal pardon had been paid.

Speaking to reporters afterwards, Shafee welcomed the court’s clarification despite maintaining that the original order was sound.

View the original on Malay Mail →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.