The Jerusalem PostShe made aliyah at 16 - today, she's teaching the next generation about AIESPN🏈 NFL Week 7 predictions: Upsets, fantasy sleepers and moreESPN DeportesValencia tuvo el segundo, se lo anularon y el Villarreal le empatRTP DesportoTiago Pereira conquista título de pares no Lisboa Belém OpenZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDF20 Minuten«Mein Bruder wollte mir seine Ex-Frau schlechtreden»CBS NewsPolice and protesters clash in France after day of demonstrationsThe Sydney Morning HeraldYoung investors love AI stocks. Are they falling into a debt trap?The South AfricanKaizer Chiefs make decision on Da Cruz’s future after CAF exitOnet"Z partyzanta dzwonię". Policjantka miała ostrzec podejrzanego w sprawie zoo w ŁącznejGMA NewsViolence flares in Paris after largely peaceful protests across FranceMintWhich countries have the world’s largest militaries? China leads in troops, US in air power — where does India stand?
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Saturday, October 24, 2026

Revilla bid to inhibit justice junked anew

Translate

Former senator Bong Revilla at the Department of Justice as he filed his counter-affidavit on his plunder complaint on Feb. 12, 2026.

Philstar.com / Ian Laqui

MANILA, Philippines — The Sandiganbayan has upheld its earlier ruling denying former senator Ramon Revilla Jr.’s bid to stop one of its justices – who specifically ruled to deny him P1 million bail – from hearing his malversation case.

The anti-graft court’s Third Division “denied for lack of merit” Revilla’s motion for reconsideration of the denial of his earlier motion intended to make Associate Justice Karl Miranda inhibit from his case.

Miranda, chairman of the Third Division, previously objected to the court’s majority ruling to grant Revilla P1 million bail for his temporary freedom amid his ongoing trial for malversation.

The case stemmed from allegations that he received kickbacks from a P92.8-million ghost flood control project in Pandi, Bulacan.

Miranda asserted it was “difficult to justify” Revilla’s being granted temporary liberty while his co-accused remain behind bars.

In his motion, Revilla accused Miranda of being biased against his bail petition. In contesting his bail petition, Revilla claimed Miranda relied only on “uncorroborated and bare” testimony of state witness former public works undersecretary Roberto Bernardo. Revilla noted Miranda’s brother had acted as Bernardo’s counsel.

In denying his motion for reconsideration, the Sandiganbayan said the former senator “has not presented any new or additional act, conduct, or circumstance that could be considered as clear and convincing evidence of Justice Miranda’s bias and prejudice that would warrant his recusal from hearing the instant case.”

“Justice Miranda has already shown that his Separate Opinion is based on a thorough analysis of all the evidence presented by the prosecution, and thus, it cannot be simply disregarded as evidence of bias or prejudice,” according to the Third Division’s seven-page resolution.

Third Division members Associate Justices Ronald Moreno and Fritz Bryn Anthony delos Santos concurred with the decision.

View the original on The Philippine Star →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.