Reputation is built in ordinary moments

Reputation is one of the most misunderstood assets in public life. Leaders often treat it as something manufactured by communications teams: a slogan unveiled, a speech polished, a logo refreshed, a flattering interview secured. Yet reputation is not what an institution says about itself. It is what people conclude after watching how that institution behaves when applause is unlikely, and publicity is absent.

The decisive moments are usually small. A chief executive acknowledges the cleaner. A governor returns a grieving family’s call. A manager pays a struggling supplier when promised. A permanent secretary refuses to bend a rule for a relative. None may become a headline, but each becomes testimony. Employees talk, citizens remember, and communities compare promises with experience. Long before a crisis exposed a leader, ordinary conduct had already written the first draft of the verdict.

This is why reputation is better understood as accumulated trust. It grows slowly through consistency and can be depleted through repeated indifference. Grand gestures matter only when they reveal, rather than disguise, a settled character. Nelson Mandela’s appearance in the Springbok jersey at the 1995 Rugby World Cup final became iconic because it condensed a larger ethic into one visible act. By embracing a symbol many Black South Africans associated with apartheid, he did not merely stage reconciliation; he accepted the political risk of making former adversaries feel that they, too, belonged in the new nation.

Jacinda Ardern offered a different expression of the same principle after the 2019 mosque attack in Christchurch. She went to the bereaved, wore a headscarf out of respect, embraced survivors, and declared, “They are us.” Her government’s swift firearms reforms gave policy substance to compassion, but her presence answered the more elemental question citizens ask in tragedy: Does the state truly see us? Empathy became not sentimentality, but intelligence—the capacity to enter another person’s reality before exercising power.

George Washington’s resignation as commander-in-chief in 1783 revealed yet another dimension of reputation: restraint. Having led a victorious army, he surrendered his commission to civilian authority. The act established that power could be relinquished rather than possessed. In societies where office is routinely personalised, the leader who submits to rules permits institutions to function and prepares a credible succession makes a profound statement without delivering a speech.

These examples carry an urgent Nigerian lesson. Nigerians are not suffering from a shortage of declarations. Public institutions publish values, companies advertise social responsibility, and political leaders promise inclusion. The deficit lies between language and lived experience. Citizens notice whose convoy forces them off the road, whose office ignores petitions, whose agency explains delays, whose company settles small invoices, who accepts responsibility, and who vanishes when disaster strikes. Trust is formed in that gap.

• Different runners, one baton
• Beyond politics: What defines leader’s legacy?
• Singer Ed Sheeran returns to stage after boycott calls, Palestine row

For organisations in banking, energy, ports, construction, transport and public administration, this gap can become existential. A glossy annual report cannot compensate for contemptuous complaint handling. A stakeholder forum cannot erase a community’s experience of being consulted only after decisions are final. Nor can philanthropy neutralise a culture in which junior workers are humiliated, and vendors are made to beg for legitimate payment. Communication can amplify character; it cannot indefinitely counterfeit it.

The most useful reputation question, therefore, is not, “How will this look in tomorrow’s newspaper?” It is, “What will the person affected by this decision say when no executive is present?” That question relocates reputation from the media office to the meeting room, the payment desk, the security gate and the condolence visit. It makes every employee a custodian of institutional credibility and every routine encounter a test of culture.

Leaders may survive an awkward speech, an unpopular reform or a difficult quarter. What they rarely survive intact is a sustained pattern of arrogance, unfairness and broken promises. Eventually, the private record becomes public reality. The meeting nobody records, the criticism not punished, the queue not jumped and the promise quietly kept all enter the moral ledger.

Ordinary moments, then, are never merely ordinary. They are the workshops in which authority becomes credible or hollow, and where institutions disclose who they truly are. Public ceremonies may display reputation, but daily conduct creates it. In the end, the reputation leaders inherit is simply the character they practised when they believed nobody important was watching.

Dr Peterside, leadership architect and management turnaround expert, is the author of the book Leading in a Storm