CNN TürkBENZİNE İNDİRİM: Benzin Litre Fiyatı Ne Kadar Oldu? Akaryakıt, Benzin, Motorin, LPG kaç TL? İstanbul, Ankara, İzmir Güncel Akaryakıt FiyatlarıPunchYayi announces road, hospital construction for Ogun communitiesThe Jerusalem PostHegseth dismisses renewed impeachment threat: 'It won't work with me'ZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-Nachrichtenstudio한겨레〔놀라운 우주〕 지구 대기가 연출한 ‘48가지 빛깔 보름달’Collider5 HBO Mystery Shows With No Bad Seasons, RankedVanguardLASTMA inducts 100 volunteers to tackle Yuletide trafficRTL BoulevardA32 bij Grou dicht door 84 gevaarlijke lampen in aquaduct: glas kan op de weg vallenDaily MailMoment hero Nottingham Forest fan fights off Huntingdon train knifeman as fleeing passengers hide in kitchenNew Straits TimesSilicon Valley faces Democratic reckoning after betting on TrumpThe Sydney Morning HeraldA rapid-fire round with Ben CarrollESPN DeportesRavens buscan sorprender a Jaguars con su tercer QB
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Friday, November 6, 2026

Ex-DDS cop's testimony sought by ICC prosecutors vs. Rodrigo Duterte

Translate

Make this your preferred source to get more updates from this publisher on Google.

THE HAGUE, Netherlands — International Criminal Court (ICC) prosecutors ask judges to admit preserved testimony from an alleged former member of the Davao Death Squad (DDS), whose evidence they say bears directly on former President Rodrigo Duterte’s alleged criminal responsibility.

In a redacted filing made public dated November 5, Acting Prosecutor Mame Mandiaye Niang asked Trial Chamber III to admit 45 transcribed statements and 61 items of associated materials from witness P-0002, identified as a former Davao City police officer.

Those supporting items include P-0002’s handwritten notes, affidavits, photographs, four organizational charts of the DDS structure, police service records, and other personal and official documents.

Unlike recent applications made by the Office of the Prosecutor under Rule 68, this request seeks admission of P-0002’s evidence under Article 69(4) of the Rome Statute.

That article states that the court “may rule on the relevance or admissibility of any evidence” considering its probative value as well as “any prejudice that it may cause to a fair trial or to a fair evaluation of the testimony of a witness.”

DDS structure, alleged policy

Prosecutors described P-0002’s evidence as being “of particular importance” to Duterte’s case, as the witness was a member of the Davao Death Squad. However, the period of his alleged membership is redacted.

His testimony covers Duterte’s alleged individual criminal responsibility and intent, the contextual elements of crimes against humanity during Duterte’s mayoral period, and charged Incident 1.

In the Prosecution’s Trial Brief, Incident 1 refers to the killing of three unidentified alleged drug pushers by DDS members in or around 2013 in San Rafael, Davao City. In this incident, then Davao City Mayor Duterte “instructed police DDS members that there was a job to be done against three alleged drug pushers”.

Prosecutors said P-0002 provided evidence on the origins, structure, and purpose of the DDS, as well as the scope of what the prosecution calls the “Common Plan” in Davao City and the roles of alleged co-perpetrators.

His testimony also concerns the alleged widespread nature of the killings, the targeting of suspected criminals, and the DDS’s alleged modus operandi during the charged period.

According to prosecutors, P-0002’s evidence supports the alleged existence of a policy to “neutralise” suspected criminals in Davao City through measures that included financial incentives, the use of state and civilian forces, and the dissemination of the policy by Duterte to alleged perpetrators.

“Unique opportunity”

Prosecutors interviewed P-0002 from May 10 to 16, 2022, after Pre-Trial Chamber I authorized the interview amid concerns that his evidence might later become unavailable.

The Chamber found a “unique opportunity” to interview P-0002 and a significant risk that his evidence “may not be subsequently available.”

A defense counsel appointed to protect the interests of any future accused was present during the interview, along with counsel for P-0002.

The filing says prosecutors were informed of a development concerning P-0002 in June 2024, but the details are redacted. It later states that “P-0002 is no longer available,” but does not expound or clarify.

Prosecutors argued that the preserved testimony should be admitted under Article 69 because it was obtained through a judicially authorized evidence-preservation procedure.

They said it could alternatively be admitted under Rule 68(2)(c) of the ICC Rules of Procedure – or about prior recorded testimony from “a person who has subsequently died, must be presumed dead, or is, due to obstacles that cannot be overcome with reasonable diligence, unavailable to testify orally.”

Trial Chamber III has yet to rule on the request.

Duterte is facing three counts of crimes against humanity involving murder and attempted murder allegedly committed during his terms as Davao City mayor and Philippine president.

His trial is scheduled to begin on November 30. — BAP, GMA News

View the original on GMA News →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.