CNN TürkDronların korkulu rüyası: TOLGA!The Jerusalem PostInmate killed in northern Israel after leaving prison as part of rehabilitation programInquirerLTO suspends license of SUV driver linked to cellphone seller’s deathSky TG24Sinner, trofei e vittorie in carriera: i record del primo italiano campione a WimbledonPunchUAE sponsors mass wedding for 250 Palestinian couplesZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFWirtualna PolskaKryzys wokół Trybunału Konstytucyjnego. Miażdżąca ocena PolakówIl Fatto QuotidianoAAA cercasi agenti segreti: 40mila candidature in 24 ore per il primo concorso pubblico per diventare “007”, ecco i requisiti richiesti e come candidarsiNHK 社会プロボウラーの中山律子さんが死去 一大ブームをけん引 84歳Daily MailDolly Parton's new SongTeller hotel and museum in Nashville is pitch-perfect tribute to Queen of Country - but the footage she recorded before her death is hard to watchХабрЧто там с китайским авиапромомMyJoyOnlineWas TrafficTech-GH designed to raise revenue for gov’t? – Fiifi Boafo questions 60% share of fines
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Saturday, November 7, 2026

TrafficTech, although good, is not backed by law – Lawyer

Translate

Legal practitioner Albert Gyamfi says the newly implemented TraffiTech-GH system is illegal, saying that it lacks the necessary legal backing and unfairly imposes traffic fines on vehicle owners rather than the actual offenders.

Speaking on JoyNews’ Newsfile on Saturday, November 7, he acknowledged that the technology-driven traffic enforcement initiative was a good idea but insisted that its current implementation raises fundamental legal concerns.

“So, I think TraffiTech, although good, currently is illegal. That's my main position. It's illegal,” the Head of Chambers at Gyamfi Legal PRUC in Kumasi said.

Mr Gyamfi explained that his position was based on two main concerns: the absence of specific legal provisions supporting the system and the manner in which penalties are imposed.

He said that the system targets registered vehicle owners with fines instead of identifying and holding accountable the individuals who actually commit the traffic offences.

“The means by which charges are imposed are also illegal because it imposes fines on the wrong person; that is, it imposes fines on the owners of the vehicle instead of the actual perpetrators of the offence,” he stated.

He called for changes to the system, insisting that its current framework must be reviewed to address the legal concerns.

“These are my two reasons why I feel TraffiTech currently needs to change,” he added.

Background

TraffiTech-GH is an automated traffic enforcement initiative developed by the Ghana Police Service to improve road safety through technology-driven monitoring and detection of traffic offences.

The idea dates back to around 2008, when efforts began to introduce camera-based systems to identify traffic offenders and issue spot fines. However, the initiative faced several delays before gaining momentum.

In 2016, an agreement was reached to deploy the system in 2017, but the rollout did not materialise as planned. A public-private partnership agreement was eventually signed on December 23, 2022, for an 11-year period.

Public education and the issuance of electronic caution notices began in June 2024, with the Police reportedly sending about 120,000 notices by the end of 2025. MyJoyOnline

The Interior Ministry formally announced the initiative on August 24, 2026, explaining that it would use fixed cameras, mobile cameras, handheld devices and radar systems to capture traffic violations.

The Police initially scheduled full implementation for October 1, 2026, but subsequently postponed the enforcement date by a month following concerns about public sensitisation.

The system finally became operational on November 1, 2026, initially targeting speeding offences. Motorists detected exceeding prescribed speed limits receive electronic notices, with 14 days to pay the applicable fines or contest the alleged violations in court. MyJoyOnline+3

The introduction has, however, generated opposition from commercial transport operators, who have questioned the fairness of enforcing traffic regulations while some designated bus stops and pedestrian walkways remain occupied by traders.

Add MyJoyOnline as a preferred source on GoogleSee more of our stories when you search on Google. (opens in a new tab)

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.

Tags:  

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.

View the original on MyJoyOnline →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.