The Jerusalem PostFormer Yisrael Beytenu MK Esterina Tartman dies at 68ESPN DeportesMessi domina el presente y el futuro del futbol en Estados UnidosESPNWhat does the future hold for Knicks, Spurs, Thunder and every NBA team? We stacked all 30Daily Maverick‘LIFE’S A GLITCH’: ANC to ‘exercise its legal rights’ after Electoral Court dismisses candidate list casePunchBolt sees 92% spike in Nigerian driver registrations after Uber exitוואלהמשאית פגעה בכבל מתח גבוה באזור בית שמש; הפסקות חשמל בכמה יישוביםBollywood HungamaVijay Varma announces Matka King season 2 with first episode script: "Ek aur baazi"RTP DesportoVasco chega às `meias` da Sul-Americana após 15 anosDeadline‘Spring Awakening’ Revival Sets Principal Cast Including ‘John Proctor Is The Villain’s Amalia YooIl Fatto QuotidianoIl Tottenham di De Zerbi perde ancora, Dugarry lo demolisce: “Sta facendo una rapina. È fuori di testa, nessuno gli dice di stare zitto”VanguardWike should meet APC governors, explain his Rainbow Coalition — Joe Igbokwe
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, September 16, 2026

Sharon Otieno’s Family Requests Leniency For Okoth Obado As Prosecution Demands Firm Sentence

Translate

The parents of murdered university student Sharon Otieno have formally requested the High Court to consider reconciliation and hand down a non-custodial sentence to former Migori Governor Okoth Obado, even as state prosecutors argued that the ultimate penalty rests solely with the judiciary.

During sentencing proceedings for Obado and his co-convicts, Michael Oyamo and Caspal Obiero, the victim’s family presented their position through their legal representative. The parents urged the presiding judge to exercise leniency, revealing that their relationship with the former governor had remained cordial and that they favor a restorative approach rather than prison time for Obado.

While acknowledging the family’s submission as a factor in the proceedings, the prosecution emphasized that murder remains a capital offence committed against the State. State counsel maintained that the victims’ wishes cannot override statutory sentencing guidelines, urging the court to consider the gravity, premeditation, and coordinated nature of the crime. Prosecutors noted that the convicts used their positions as public officials and trusted associates to carry out a planned scheme, arguing that high culpability must be reflected in the final verdict despite the convicts having no prior criminal records.

The court is currently deliberating on the submissions from the prosecution, defence counsel, and the victim’s family before delivering the official sentence.

View the original on Ghafla

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.