וואלהשגריר ארה"ב בדרום אפריקה: הגבלות הוויזה הן רק צעד ראשוןPunchFour killed in Lagos-Ibadan Expressway crashBollywood HungamaSHOCKING: Gurugram youth takes inspiration from Vikrant Massey’s Pritam And Pedro character to allegedly con student of Rs. 24.60 lakhsThe Jerusalem PostCar crashes into residential building in Hadera, driver lightly injured, ramming attempt ruled outInquirer‘Thinking Pinoy’ blogger named assistant secretary at Office of CabSecUOLJustiça condena rede de supermercados em Manaus por aplicar escala 9x1 e servir comida estragadaCNN TürkİŞKUR GENÇLİK PROGRAMI BAŞVURU 2026 | İŞKUR Gençlik Programı başvuruları başladı mı, ne zaman başlayacak?Sky TG24Resident Evil, 15 cose da sapere sul nuovo film. FOTORTL BoulevardViola Davis krijgt prijs bij San Diego Film FestivalIl Fatto Quotidiano“Quando sono rimasta incinta i media si concentravano sulla mia età anagrafica ma io mi sentivo 27 anni. Non ci credevano, peggio per loro. In pensione? E chi me la da? Finché c’è l’ispirazione…”: parla Gianna NanniniDeadlineDisney Seeking Next Big K-Pop Hit After Striking Ten-Project Deal With KakaoMintTukaram Mundhe's latest action plan on medical devices: MRP vs procurement prices revealed
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, September 16, 2026

SC: Congress has duty to pass law banning political dynasties

Translate
SC: Congress has constitutional duty to pass law banning political dynasties
ANTI DYNASTY BILL NOW / JANUARY 27, 2026Progressive group Akbayan Youth stages a protest at the House of Representatives in Quezon City in this file photo taken on January 27, 2026, and calls on Congress to fulfill its long-delayed constitutional duty to pass an Anti-Political Dynasty Law as congress conducts a hearing on the said bill. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO / GRIG C. MONTEGRANDE

MANILA, Philippines – The Supreme Court has ruled that Congress has a constitutional duty to craft and pass a law prohibiting political dynasties, noting that its continued inaction over the past 39 years amounts to a continuing violation.

Camille Ting, the high tribunal’s spokesperson, announced the en banc’s unanimous ruling on the consolidated petitions for certiorari and mandamus filed by various groups that urged the Supreme Court to compel the Congress to enact a law that defines and bans political dynasties.

READ: SC grants petition urging Congress to pass law vs political dynasties

Article continues after this advertisement

Ting said that the Supreme Court cited Article II, Sec. 26 of the 1987 Charter, which explicitly says that the “State shall guarantee equal access to opportunities for public service and prohibit political dynasties as may be defined by law.

FEATURED STORIES

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

She stressed that the use of the word “shall” in the Constitution means that both the Senate and the House of Representatives “does not give Congress a choice whether to prohibit political dynasties,” rather it gives it authority and a mandatory duty to act on the matter. 

READ: SC asked: Tell Congress to ban political dynasties

“The Supreme Court noted that political dynasties have remained widespread and have extended even into the party-list system. Despite changes in the composition of Congress over the years, no comprehensive anti-political dynasty law has been enacted, implying either a lack of interest, avoidance for convenience, or service of self-interest,” said Ting in a press conference.

While the high tribunal “strongly urged” the Congress to carry out its constitutional obligation with “utmost urgency,”  it did not set a deadline for the enactment of the law.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: SC urged: Prod Congress to pass antidynasty law

Studies have shown that political dynasties contribute to the worsening poverty in some of the poorest areas in the country as they control the majority of the elective posts. /jpv

View the original on Inquirer

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.