The Jerusalem PostLondon plane lands in Warsaw-Modlin airport after explosive device reported on boardPunchSokoto pledges stronger security partnershipsDaily MaverickADMINISTRATIVE CHAOS: Athletics SA moves rapidly to implement World Athletics leadership overhaul directiveBollywood HungamaKaran Tacker to begin shooting for Bhay: The Gaurav Tiwari Mystery Season 2 in MarchInquirer EntertainmentKatrina Johnson nixes idea of Miss International ‘archetype’SoompiWoo Davi And Kim Hyun Jin’s Upcoming 2026 KBS Drama Special “Sound:Track” Unveils Intriguing First PosterSky TG24Elezioni Midterm 2026, oggi il voto di metà mandato negli Stati Uniti. DIRETTAZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFسكاي نيوز عربيةضربات أميركية على قشم.. وطهران تقول إن الاتفاق بعيدNumeramaPrès d’un jeu sur deux sorti sur Steam en octobre 2026 a eu recours à l’IA générativeTagesschauLiveblog zu den Midterms: ++ US-Bürger wählen neuen Kongress ++Il Fatto QuotidianoDietro le quinte de “La porta magica” con Andrea Delogu, tra storie, emozioni e confessioni: “Questo programma mi ha salvata”
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Tuesday, November 3, 2026

Objection of VP Sara's lawyers vs offer of evidence not based on truth - Ridon

Translate

Make this your preferred source to get more updates from this publisher on Google.

The objection made by Vice President Sara Duterte’s defense team on the House Prosecution’s offer of evidence in relation to her impeachment trial is not based on the truth, said House prosecution team member Representative Terry Ridon on Tuesday.

According to GMA News’ Bea Pinlac, Ridon said they already expected the defense lawyers to object to all pieces of evidence they submitted before the Senate impeachment court.

“Expected na po namin’yung pag-object ng depensa, but that is an objection that is not based on truth, it is not based on what we had seen in the last couple of weeks. So tignan natin kung ano ‘yung gagawin nilang paglalatag ng ebidensya at depensa nila,” he told reporters.

(We already expected the defense to object, but that is an objection that is not based on truth—it is not based on what we have seen in the last couple of weeks. So let's see how they will present their evidence and defense.)

The formal offer includes all documentary evidence and witness testimonies presented by the prosecution in support of Article 2 of the impeachment complaint, which alleges that Duterte accumulated unexplained wealth through assets not declared in her Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Net Worth (SALN).

Ridon said Duterte’s defense lawyers actually objected to all the evidence they submitted including SALNs, bank records, insurance records, records from the Bureau of Internal Revenue and the Anti-Money Laundering Council, among others.

“The defense has objected, we will leave it to the Senate impeachment court to make a determination on all the pieces of evidence,” he said.

In their response to the Prosecution’s offer of evidence, the Defense said the evidence submitted is the result of an "impermissible fishing expedition and, thus, inadmissible as evidence."

For his part, Ridon said the House prosecutors questioned the defense team’s “blanket objection.”

“Medyo nakakatawa na meron po silang blanket objection sa lahat ng piraso ng ebidensya na isinumite ng prosekusyon…That the defense is defenseless is probably a good description of it,” he said.

(It is somewhat laughable that they have a blanket objection to every single piece of evidence submitted by the prosecution… That the defense is defenseless is probably a good description of it.)

GMA News has reached out to the defense team for a comment. —RF, GMA News

View the original on GMA News →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.