Creative arts enrolments are dropping for Year 12. Here’s what parents and students should know
When students choose their Year 11 and 12 subjects, they are deciding more than their pathway to university. They are choosing the kinds of learning and experiences available to them.
Yet senior Australian students are increasingly turning away from creative arts subjects.
Why might this be happening? And what are young people losing if these opportunities disappear?
What are the figures?
An analysis of national figures shows between 2015 and 2023, Year 12 enrolments fell by 39% in drama, 38% in dance, 16% in music and 14% in visual arts.
We also know there are different patterns across different states and school systems.
For example, earlier this month, The Sydney Morning Herald reported NSW public school enrolments in drama fell from 2,403 in 2016 to 1,441 last year (a drop of about 40%).
Across private and Catholic schools, enrolments dipped from 2,321 to 1,751 (a drop of about 25%) over the same period.
Why are students turning away?
There is no single explanation, but curriculum priorities and university entrance pressures provide some clues.
Education policy has increasingly emphasised science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM), sometimes positioning these disciplines as more “valuable” when it comes to employment than the arts.
A 2024 NSW parliamentary inquiry identified the prioritisation of STEM subjects, job-readiness and perceptions of future earnings as factors contributing to the devaluing of creative arts education.
Students’ ATAR concerns compound the problem. The NSW inquiry also heard some students and parents believe that drama or music will not scale well and disadvantage university entrance:
students are dissuaded or discouraged from pursuing their passions […] for fear of being scaled poorly and the pressures around achieving a high ATAR.
The committee recommended a “myth busting” campaign targeted at students, parents and schools to provide accurate information about how creative arts subjects are scaled.
There have also been curriculum changes to drama and music, which teachers have argued limit student choice and creativity.
These can all have a compounding effect. Falling enrolments mean smaller classes, which lead to subject closures and fewer choices for the next group of students coming through.
Read more: How does subject scaling work for Year 12? And why is it unfair?
What are students losing?
An analysis of national figures shows between 2012 and 2022, the proportion of male Year 12 students taking an arts subject fell from 22.2% to 15.8%. For female students, it fell from 37.6% to 26.9%.
These represent broadly comparable proportional declines of around 29% each. So this is not simply a story about boys abandoning the arts. But the gender dimension should not be ignored here.
Subjects such as drama offers opportunities to explore emotion, vulnerability and perspectives different from one’s own. Through characterisation, collaborative performance and negotiating creative differences, students can practise empathy, emotional communication and shared responsibility. These experiences can help challenge toxic masculinity and restrictive expectations that frame vulnerability as weakness.
Research on senior secondary drama classrooms shows students can negotiate gender expectations through dramatic characters and classroom practice.
Drama cannot dismantle these attitudes by itself, but it creates valuable spaces in which they can be explored and challenged.
These are demanding subjects
Drama, music and visual arts are also academically demanding disciplines. They require interpretation, analysis, experimentation, critical judgement and sustained practice. They also require performance under pressure.
These are not alternatives to academic learning – they are forms of academic learning. A systematic review of educational drama research, for example, found it can have potential benefits for students’ critical thinking, creativity, communication and collaboration.
These skills particularly matter in an age of artificial intelligence, where students need to learn how to question and evaluate information and exercise creative judgement. In the arts, the process of making and revising is itself an important part of learning.
What needs to change?
Reversing this decline requires more than encouraging individual students to choose creative subjects. Governments and education authorities must reconsider curriculum and funding priorities, challenge misconceptions about ATAR scaling, support specialist teachers and facilities, and strengthen arts education in teacher preparation.
The question is not whether every student should study drama, music or visual arts. It is whether young people should lose access to these important forms of learning because our education system signals that other forms of knowledge matters more.
KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.