ESPN DeportesPor qué Barcelona es el mejor equipo del comienzo de la temporada europeaESPNLegendary coach, Hall of Fame TE Ditka dies at age 86InquirerLRT-1 operator to upgrade PITX station for better passenger flowThe Jerusalem PostA casualty of war: Israel's breathtaking historical site remains out of reach after October 7Daily MaverickCricket: Anrich Nortje’s impressive Test cricket return hands Proteas narrow advantage over AussiesZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFDeadlineDanny Boyle Says ‘28 Years Later: Part III’ Is Currently On The “Back Burner”Radio TimesTop 10 Picks of the Week – Sunday 11 OctoberBBC NewsLib Dem MP quits frontbench job over Ed Davey's leadershipCBS NewsHurricane Isaias becomes Category 3 storm as it threatens northern Gulf CoastGolem.dePornhub und Youporn: Oberverwaltungsgericht lehnt Sperren gegen Pornoseiten abDW EnglishFranco-German relations: Steinmeier and Macron say their farewells and create a new momentum for Europe
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Friday, October 9, 2026

Anthropic claims Chinese AI firms secretly use Claude. Is it true?

Translate

Did Chinese AI companies secretly tap US models to close the technology gap? That is the central question hanging over China’s tech sector following a wave of allegations from Washington and American AI lab Anthropic.

According to a joint advisory by the National Security Agency, FBI, and Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency last month, Chinese AI developers have been systematically extracting capabilities from US frontier models to reduce their own computing, electricity and research costs.

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent similarly warned in July that Chinese firms were engaged in large-scale “distillation”.

Specifically, Anthropic claimed Chinese AI developers used fraudulent accounts and proxy networks to siphon reasoning data from its flagship model, Claude – and in some cases even used the US model as a covert back end for their own apps.

View the original on South China Morning Post →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.