Daily MaverickSPRAY TELL: Bread & Wine: The chemical trail through wheat and grapes (Part Five)InquirerPhilippines has enough natural fibers for textile growth—DARTP Desporto18h30 Portugal aflito no voleibol e com F1 de regressoThe Jerusalem PostA recipe for disaster: Edward Miliband, Britain, and relations with Israel - opinionESPNMcVay: Was clear after Rams' loss that Garrett needed knee surgeryESPN Deportes¿LeBron James ganará un título con su cuarto equipo en la NBA?וואלהדיווח איראני: איש דת סוני נורה למוות ע"י חמושים לא מזוהים בדרום מזרח המדינהCapital FMRuto: Govt to Support Raila Family in Anniversary PreparationsCBS NewsEPA to eliminate limits on climate pollution from power plantsTechCrunchClickFix attacks are tricking Mac and Windows users into hacking themselvesConsequenceLin-Manuel Miranda Announces Definitive Hamilton Box Set for 10th AnniversaryDeadline‘Yaga’ Sets U.S. Release Date On AMC+; Watch Sneak Peek Ahead Of TIFF World Premiere
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Monday, September 14, 2026

Why Delhi HC rejected Vimal Elaichi makers' plea over FDA notice to SRK, Ajay Devgn, Tiger Shroff

Translate

The Delhi high court on Monday rejected a petition by the makers of Vimal Elaichi seeking to quash show-cause notices issued by the Maharashtra food and drugs administration (FDA) to brand ambassadors Shah Rukh Khan, Ajay Devgn and Tiger Shroff.

Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma said the court lacked territorial jurisdiction to hear the matter. The judge said the petitioner should approach courts in Maharashtra, which would be the more suitable and convenient forum to address its concerns about the notices, under the doctrine of forum conveniens.

What did the petition say?

PB Agro LLP, in its petition, said it hires established film actors to advertise its cardamom product sold under the 'Vimal' brand. The company said it has entered into endorsement deals with the actors and is taking steps to ensure its advertising campaigns comply with applicable laws.

The company said the Maharashtra FDA had issued notices alleging that advertisements for Vimal Elaichi were a form of surrogate promotion for Vimal Pan Masala. Its counsel argued that the August 11 FDA notice was issued only to the actors, not to the company, even though the company would be the one to face serious consequences from any action by the state regulator.

Inside the FDA notice over Vimal ad

The notice, dated August 11, 2026, was issued under the Food Safety and Standards Act (FSS Act), 2006, and related regulations to Bollywood actors Shah Rukh Khan, Ajay Devgn and Tiger Shroff over their role as brand endorsers in an advertisement for Vimal Elaichi, HT reported earlier.

The FDA said in the notice that the Vimal brand is “prominently associated with Pan Masala in the market” and noted that pan masala products are prohibited in Maharashtra.

The FDA told the actors to end their involvement in the advertisement with immediate effect. It also instructed them to take down promotional material from their official social media accounts and other platforms, while seeking information about the due diligence they had conducted before agreeing to endorse the product.

The actors were further asked to hand over their endorsement agreements, campaign briefs and other relevant records.

The FDA also sought an explanation on whether Vimal Elaichi is a standalone product or is being used as a surrogate communication for Vimal Pan Masala or tobacco-related products.

View the original on Hindustan Times

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.