PunchEbonyi PDP gov candidate pledges to end child hawking, house-help cultureRTP DesportoMédio do Benfica Enzo Barrenechea operado ao joelho esquerdoThe Jerusalem PostConverse removes ad campaign criticized over KKK-esque imagery, issues apologyCNN بالعربيةرياضيون وأثرياء ينامون على هذا السرير الذكي.. ما فائدته؟عالم التقنيةهونر تستعد لإطلاق سلسلة WIN 2 و WIN Pad للألعاب في أكتوبر7sur7Macron remet la Légion d’honneur à Martin Scorsese et Robert De NiroGMA News4 katao, kabilang ang 3 menor de edad, sugatan matapos saktan umano ng ilang barangay officialsVilaWeb“L’espardenya o l’esvàstica, tu tries”: protesta antifeixista de Junts, ERC, Comuns i la CUP al parlamentChannel News AsiaCOE premiums all close lower in latest bidding exerciseIl Fatto QuotidianoLionel Richie per la terza volta ricoverato in ospedale: il cuore del “re della disco” cede ancora, il tour viene cancellatoThe Sydney Morning HeraldNRL Tips - Finals Week 3BBC NewsMigrants taken to Dover after more than 30 hours at sea
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, September 23, 2026

Huge Row After Report Flags 2 Election Commissioners Objected To Poll Panel Steps

Translate

Leaders of Opposition parties have launched a massive offensive against the Election Commission of India (ECI) after a report by the Indian Express newspaper said two election commissioners "objected on record" several decisions taken by the poll body allegedly without their knowledge.

However, people with direct knowledge of the matter told NDTV no election commissioner gave any dissent. They had only made some observations which the poll body looked into, sources said.

All decisions taken by the ECI have the signatures of the three officers - Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, and Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi, people familiar with the matter said.

The ECI rules have a provision of majority decision prevailing if two out of the three election commissioners agree on a matter, sources said.

"All decisions of the Election Commission of India, including SIR, have been unanimous and with the approval of both the election commissioners and the chief election commissioner," an official familiar with the matter said.

This issue has opened a new and much more volatile front in the long battle between the Opposition and the ruling BJP over the ECI's voter roll cleanup exercise, Special Intensive Revision (SIR), which the Opposition alleged was a sophisticated process to exclude voters for the BJP's gain.

Latest and Breaking News on NDTV

Shiv Sena (UT) leader Sanjay Raut, Congress's Manish Tewari, Samajwadi Party's Akhilesh Yadav and DMK spokesperson Saravanan Annadurai led the charge this morning after the report came out.

"On behalf of BJP, he is doing the biggest crime ever a chief election commissioner can do to democracy. The BJP has given him immunity, but he doesn't know his name would be written in bold, black letters in history. No free and fair election is possible as long as this man is sitting on this chair if the reported allegations are true," Raut told NDTV, referring to the chief election commissioner.

"The way the BJP won elections in Maharashtra, West Bengal and other states itself raises questions," he said.

Manish Tewari in a post on X called for impeachment of the CEC. "This is perhaps a fit case for seriously considering an impeachment proceeding but more importantly the fundamental question is as to how will the credibility of the Election Commission be ever resurrected?" he wrote, sharing the report with the headline '14 Times in 10 Months, Two Election Commissioners Objected On Record To Poll Panel Steps'.

Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav in a post on X took a swipe at the ECI, calling it a "puppet". "For some people to betray democracy by becoming puppets of those in power is a grave constitutional crime. This is nothing less than a conspiracy to wipe out democracy," he said.

The DMK's national spokesperson told NDTV the ECI has made a mockery of the SIR exercise. "It has become a joke now because everywhere people are questioning because their names are being deleted. Their names are in the draft roll, but they're still being called to question why their names are not there in 2002," Annadurai said.

View the original on NDTV

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.