וואלהארה"ב תאפשר למשלחת האיראנית להגיע לעצרת האו"ם - תחת מגבלותDaily MaverickLONG CAPITAL: The rules of pension fund investment have changedRTP DesportoManchester City nos oitavos da Taça da Liga Inglesa ao golear secundário NorwichESPNRaptors offseason recap, season preview: Does Kawhi make them a contender?ESPN DeportesEl City avanza sin problemas a la siguiente ronda de la Carabao CupThe Jerusalem PostUS approves possible sale of F-35 fighter jets to Saudi Arabia7sur7Trump retire son candidat au poste de directeur de la police de l’immigrationCBS NewsF-16 from Texas crashes in Michigan, evacuation order issuedDeadlineEmily Deschanel, Ryder Allen, Carrie Brownstein & Nick Thune Among New Additions To Coming-Of-Age Dramedy ‘Friend Thing’VarietyNintendo of America President on Switch 2 Life Cycle and ‘The Legend of Zelda’ Anniversary Plans: ‘This Is Just Beginning’Radio-CanadaÉric Duhaime veut alléger le fardeau administratif des agriculteursBillboardBarbra Streisand Slams Trump’s ‘Unchecked Ego’ as POTUS Hints at Kennedy Center Demolition
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Thursday, September 17, 2026

Makabayan: Pending antidynasty bill merely regulates relatives in office

Translate
Antidynasty bill tested through ‘consultations’
EARLY FEEDBACK The House committee on suffrage holds the first public consultation on the antidynasty bills filed in the 20th Congress, for which the House leadership has repeatedly declared support. Based on the initial feedback, it is proving to be a divisive issue among voters. —Photo courtesy of the House of Representatives

MANILA, Philippines — The Makabayan bloc has warned that the version of the proposed antidynasty bill pending in Congress does not abide by the Supreme Court directive to prohibit relatives from holding public office simultaneously.

While it welcomed the Supreme Court ruling that compelled the legislature to pass an enabling law that would finally put a blanket ban on political dynasties, Makabayan expressed alarm that the current version of the bill does not prohibit, but merely aims to regulate, if not legitimize.

“A measure that merely limits the number of family members who may simultaneously hold office does not dismantle dynastic rule—it institutionalizes it under a veneer of reform. Regulation is not prohibition, and no amount of legislative wordplay can make it so,” it said in a statement.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: House approves anti-dynasty bill on third and final reading

FEATURED STORIES

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

NEWSINFO

The bloc, composed of ACT Teachers Rep. Antonio Tinio, Gabriela Women’s Party Rep. Sarah Elago and Kabataan Rep. Renee Louise Co, stressed that a “genuine enabling law” must ban political dynasties outright “without loopholes that allow powerful families to rotate seats among relatives.”

“The Filipino people did not wait four decades for a law that formalizes the very evil the Constitution sought to eliminate,” it added.

The high court, in its unanimous decision this week, ruled that Congress has an obligation under the 1987 Constitution to ensure equal opportunities for public service through legislation that would prohibit political dynasties.

READ: Hontiveros wants anti-dynasty bill tackled despite chairmanship change

Article continues after this advertisement

The Congress, it noted, has committed “grave abuse of discretion and manifest injustice” in failing to perform its constitutional duty.

On June 3 this year, the House of Representatives passed on third and final reading a bill barring spouses and relatives of up to a second degree of consanguinity and affinity from holding elective posts at the same time. This version was transmitted to the Senate five days later.

Article continues after this advertisement

Its counterpart bill in the Senate has remained pending on second reading.

Proposed measures outlawing dynasties in the past have failed to gain traction as Congress has consistently been dominated by political families and clans.

President Marcos, whose sister is a sitting senator and who comes from a wide political family, said he supports the Supreme Court order for Congress to pass an anti-dynasty bill, which has been one of his priority bills.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.

Your subscription has been successful.

Marcos had said he wants the bill to be passed by June 2027, or before his sixth and last State of the Nation Address (Sona). /cb

View the original on Inquirer

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.