InquirerMove It accountability, rider protection sought after P555.75M penaltyThe Jerusalem PostTrump: Monsey, NY Jews should vote 'in big numbers' for Lawler, he 'fights against antisemitism'Daily MaverickLOCAL ELECTIONS 2026: Joburg accused of using workers as ‘political pawns’ in last-minute wage dealThe South African[Watch] Livid Leon Schuster: ‘You’re p*ssing me off!’ZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFNOSDrenten willen strengere aanpak wolf: 'Kinderen durven niet meer op de fiets'ANSA SportJodar sconfitto al Masters di Parigi, Cobolli certo delle FinalsABC News (Australia)'Major incident' declared as police investigate NSW Health cyber breachESPNWNBA Art's 10 most iconic moments of the 2026 seasonPremium TimesPolice probe teenager’s corpse found in Cross River communityCBS NewsControl of Congress on the line as voters decide midterms — live updatesLa PresseCe qu’il faut savoir ce mardi | Élections de mi-mandat, arrestation après la mort d’un cycliste et vandalisme à Charlevoix
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Tuesday, November 3, 2026

NYT demands Brave shut down its paywall blocker and end deals with AI firms

Translate

The New York Times and other newspaper companies sued Brave Software yesterday, alleging that the browser maker illegally bypasses paywalls and sells stolen news content to AI companies.

“Brave is the supplier, dealer, and distributor of stolen copyrighted content for its own users and many of the most prominent GenAI companies, including Anthropic, Perplexity, Mistral, xAI, and Cohere,” the NYT alleged in a lawsuit filed in US District Court for the Southern District of New York. Citing third-party revenue estimates, the suit claimed that “Brave has made more than $100 million by copying and reselling publishers’ work without consent or permission,” while “publishers have received nothing.”

The lawsuit said, “AI companies pay Brave to provide them with real-time online content from the Brave search index [and use that content] to train their own AI models, or to access content they use to respond to specific user queries… or both.” The NYT lawsuit points to Brave’s website, which says the Brave Search API is “used by some of the biggest names in AI, including Cohere, Mistral, Perplexity, and You.com.”

The lawsuit accused Brave of all the major types of copyright infringement: direct infringement, contributory infringement, and vicarious infringement. The lawsuit claims Brave infringes copyrights directly by scraping articles for its search index, for its “Ask Brave” AI search feature, and for the Brave API that “serves as an illicit source of unlicensed copyrighted material, including Times journalism, to other AI companies.”

The NYT accused Brave of being “a contributory and vicarious infringer when it deliberately induces, facilitates, controls, and profits from its users’ and GenAI customers’ copying of the copyrighted content.” Finally, the lawsuit said Brave violated the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) by circumventing technological measures the NYT and other content owners use to restrict access to their articles.

“The Brave Browser includes a default setting that, when activated, causes the browser to go behind website paywalls and provide the paywalled content to the user,” the lawsuit said. The browser “blocks advertising that would otherwise appear on The Times’s website, and instead shows its own ads, offering its users a cut of the revenue even as it deprives The Times of digital advertising revenue that helps it fund the expensive effort of producing journalism,” the lawsuit said.

View the original on Ars Technica →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.