ESPN Deportes¿Qué sabemos de la pelea Canelo Álvarez vs Mbili?ESPNNC State dropped the ball -- and ended up in the Bottom 10The Jerusalem PostHope for progress after US, Iran hold first shuttle talks in monthsRTP DesportoTorreense adianta-se ao Metalist 1925 com um `bis` de Lakip na Taça Europa feminina3DNewsTitan Quest 2 не вырвется из раннего доступа Steam и Epic Games Store в 2026 году — новый трейлер и дата выхода версии 1.07sur7Pascal, victime d’une arnaque après un achat sur Amazon: “J’avais 168.000 euros, il m’en reste 80”Complete SportsPremier League Panel Rules Sunderland Penalty Call vs Arsenal IncorrectDeadlineTaylor Swift Announces Another Three New Songs For Release FridayGMA NewsPCSO Lotto Results: No winners of major jackpot draws on September 23, 2026Global NewsVancouver police say $5.8M of cocaine found in t-shirt order is record bustFootball ItaliaComputer predicts Serie A 2026/27 winners, top 4 and doomed to relegationVilaWebLa Mercè 2026: totes les activitats de cultura popular
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, September 23, 2026

Mandatory treatment order for man who called judge ‘stupid’, insulted then NEA chief executive

Translate

SINGAPORE - Angered by a district judge’s decision in a case on employment claims, a man sent multiple emails to the Judiciary, calling the judge “stupid” and “unfair”.

Joseph Ang Yew Kwang, 34, was sentenced to a three-year mandatory treatment order on Sept 23 after he pleaded guilty to three charges under the Protection from Harassment Act.

Offenders given a mandatory treatment order have to undergo treatment to address their conditions in lieu of time behind bars.

The court heard that in 2023, Ang set up a healthcare products firm with another individual, and hired an employee as a sales representative.

In 2024, the sales representative filed a claim with the Employment Claims Tribunal for unpaid salary that Ang’s business owed her and the matter was brought before District Judge Dora Tay.

In April that year, while the matter was still pending, Ang sent an email to the registry of the Supreme Court, indicating his displeasure with the judge’s conduct and requesting the registry to commence investigations, said Deputy Public Prosecutor Johan Tay.

The following month, the judge ruled in favour of the sales representative, ordering Ang to pay a sum of money to her.

Dissatisfied with the order, Ang sent four emails to the Judiciary, targeting the judge with insulting words.

He also stated that he would file a police report on her.

Between July and September that year, Ang sent more emails which included vulgarities and insults to the State Courts.

On July 23, 2024, Ang was informed that the Judiciary took a grave view of his words directed at the judge and the State Courts, and that the matter would be referred to the authorities if he persisted in sending such emails.

Despite this, Ang continued doing so.

Separately, in 2024, Ang paid a fine on behalf of his business partner who had littered in Chinatown.

When his business partner did not repay him, Ang wrote to the National Environment Agency (NEA) for a refund, but was rejected.

Frustrated by this, Ang sent multiple emails to then-NEA chief executive officer, Wong Kang Jet, hurling vulgarities and insulting words at him and various other employees in the agency.

Police reports were eventually filed against Ang.

Those convicted of using threatening, abusive or insulting words towards a public servant can be jailed for up to a year, fined up to $5,000, or both.

Nadine Chua is a correspondent covering crime and court at The Straits Times.

View the original on The Straits Times

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.