ESPN DeportesGiannis no quiere que el Heat sea presa de WolvesESPNChampions League talking points: What to make of the Man United messThe Jerusalem Post'Sheep in the Box': A pointless, sweet story of grief, robots - reviewInquirer9 hurt after fire breaks out during Buglasan Festival in Dumaguete한겨레김민석, 유시민에 “금도 지키며 비판했으면 좋겠다”매일경제헤지가 이렇게 중요합니다…석달새 수익률 10% 운명 갈린 해외ETFUOLPichações expõem tensão em colégio cívico-militar do PR após caso de câmera em banheiroZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-NachrichtenstudioRapplerDFA to China embassy: Escalatory, undiplomatic posts not helping bilateral ties경향신문이주배경 고교생 4년 새 2배 늘었는데···8개 시·도 한국어학급 ‘0’Daily MailShocking TV show exposes how Brits failed to speak up when shown around a care home... run to NAZI idealsObservador DesportoAs notícias das 2h
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Thursday, October 22, 2026

Why are uninsured vehicles not part of crash relief scheme? Supreme Court

Translate

Why are uninsured vehicles not part of crash relief scheme? Supreme Court

Union road transport ministry officials said the scheme will be notified as provided for under Central Motor Vehicle Act.

NEW DELHI: With Centre formulating a scheme to provide interim financial relief of Rs 2 lakh to families of road crash victims for deaths and Rs 1 lakh for grievous injuries, limited to accidents involving insured vehicles, SC has sought an explanation from govt on why it is not being extended to uninsured vehicles.Taking note that “Compensation to Victims (Interim Relief) Scheme, 2026” has not been notified or publicised, a bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and KV Viswanathan directed the govt to publicise it to ensure awareness. People must be made aware of their right to seek interim compensation, it said.Union road transport ministry officials said the scheme will be notified as provided for under Central Motor Vehicle Act.

Govt informed SC that the ministry shared the scheme with states and UTs on Feb 23. SC had directed the ministry in April 2025 to formulate the scheme.On why it covers only insured vehicles, officials said it was framed under provisions of MV Act dealing with insured vehicles. If the offender’s vehicle is uninsured, the matter will go to a Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT).

The apex court bench examined clause 6 of the scheme, which specifies that victims or legal heirs of the deceased can apply through a designated online portal, providing details of claims filed or pending before a MACT.

Officials said that Section 164 of the Act, which deals with compensation in cases of death or grievous injury, requires the vehicle owner or insurer to pay Rs 5 lakh and Rs 2.5 lakh for death and serious injury, respectively, under the “no-fault liability” provision. A claimant need not establish that death or injury resulted from wrongful act, neglect or default on the vehicle owner’s part.“Hence, interim relief was set at Rs 2 lakh for death and Rs 1 lakh for serious injury for immediate relief. Final compensation would be higher, depending on the order of MACT,” an official said.

View the original on Times of India →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.