It’s ‘what jihadists do’: Plan to livestream U.S. military firing squad execution draws criticism

Condemnation of U.S. plans for a public execution by military firing squad escalated Friday, as Vice President JD Vance cast doubt on whether it would be livestreamed as proposed and insisted he would not watch if it is.
Sign In or Create an Account
Nidal Hasan’s execution — scheduled for December 3 at Fort Hood, Texas, where he gunned down 13 people in 2009 — is set to be the first by U.S. military firing squad since 1945.
Asked about the planned livestream, Vance told journalists he does not “know that that’s actually going to happen.”
Get a dash of perspective along with the trending news of the day in a very readable format.
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.
The next issue of NP Posted will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
“This is a guy who committed, in my view, the worst terrorist attack on American soil outside of 9/11,” Vance said, but added that if the execution is broadcast live, “I’m not going to be watching it.”
Representative Austin Scott of President Donald Trump’s Republican Party said he supported executing Hasan but “livestreaming executions is what jihadists do. America is better than that.”
Senator Mark Kelly, a Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said Hasan should “face justice” but that public executions are “the kind of thing Iran and the Taliban do. Is this who we want to be associated with?”
A Pentagon official told AFP on Thursday that the execution would be streamed live, after U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said “we’ll make sure that people are able to watch it, that it’s public.”
But Trump on Friday contradicted Hegseth’s confirmation, and said there has been no decision yet on whether to publicly broadcast the execution, which he supports.
“They are making a determination about that, but he will be killed,” Trump said. “I really don’t care how he goes, as long as he goes.”
Tech firms YouTube, Meta and X did not immediately respond to requests for comment on whether they would allow the execution to be streamed on their platforms.
TikTok directed AFP to its policy banning depictions of “graphic incidents and violence” including “the shooting of an individual.”
The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights condemned the move, saying in a message sent to AFP on Friday that “the livestreaming of an execution is tantamount to a public execution and would breach the absolute prohibition of torture.”
Archbishop Paul Coakley, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, said it was a “barbaric promotion of a culture of death and must be reconsidered.”
Hegseth said it would be the military’s first firing squad execution since the Second World War.
“People need to understand that…there’s serious consequence for these types of things,” Hegseth said in a video shared Thursday on official Pentagon X accounts.
The last U.S. military execution was carried out in 1961, when John Bennett was hanged for rape and attempted murder.
The Death Penalty Information Center says 135 troops have been executed by the U.S. military since 1916.
According to rights group Amnesty International, at least 17 public executions are known to have been carried out in 2025 — six in Afghanistan and 11 in Iran.
Amnesty’s Justin Mazzola said Friday that the death penalty is “a violation of human rights,” and that streaming Hasan’s execution “would only compound the cruelty.”
Twelve of the 13 people Hasan killed and 30 of those he wounded were soldiers. He was shot by a civilian police officer who responded to the attack and is paralyzed from the waist down.
Hasan chose to conduct his own defence during the trial but called no witnesses and gave no testimony, and made no attempt to deny the charges.
He was sentenced to death by a military jury in 2013.
Court-appointed defence attorneys expressed concern that he was seeking execution.
The court that convicted Hasan was told he was opposed to the U.S. military’s occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan, and that he had spoken online with an alleged Al-Qaeda figure, radical cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, an American citizen subsequently killed in a U.S. drone strike in Yemen.
Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.
Join the Conversation
This website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.