The Jerusalem PostMicrosoft Outlook, Teams, Copilot recovering after global outage lasting over 24 hoursInquirerAmihan no longer affecting PH; easterlies prevailCNN TürkSabah namazı saat kaça kadar kılınır? Güneş doğduktan sonra sabah namazı kılınır mı?PunchMorning recap: Fani-Kayode, South Africa clash, Tinubu aide denies convoy attack, other top storiesSky TG24Stipendi trasparenti negli annunci di lavoro, il confronto tra l'Italia e i Paesi europeiDaily MaverickThe season is now — Time to enact family-law reformTRT HaberSürgünden ölüme: Ahıska TürkleriZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFESPN CricinfoScott, Lyon star as New South Wales secure first win under HaddinCumhuriyetFrederic Dusart'tan İsrail maçı açıklamasıعالم التقنيةسامسونج توسع اختبار One UI 9.5 تمهيدًا لإطلاق جالكسي S27매일경제11세 연하 의사 아내 임신…결혼 7년만에 아빠 되는 주진모
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Saturday, November 14, 2026

Gurgaon woman wins Rs 31,000 after restaurant refuses to waive Rs 401 charge

Translate

Gurgaon woman pays Rs 4,811 for dinner, restaurant refuses to remove Rs 401 service charge despite objection; consumer commission says mandatory service charge violates CCPA rules, orders refund and Rs 31,000 compensation

AI Image Used For Representational Purpose Only

GURGAON: A dinner outing with friends in Gurgaon ended in a consumer dispute after a woman was charged an additional 10% service fee despite asking the restaurant to remove it. The Gurugram District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has directed the restaurant to pay her Rs 31,000, including compensation for mental harassment and litigation expenses.

It has also ordered a refund of the Rs 401 service charge.The dispute dates back to May 16, 2026, when the woman visited the restaurant with her friends for dinner. She alleged that the bill included a service charge of Rs 401, equivalent to 10% of the amount. She objected to the additional charge and asked the restaurant to remove it. However, the establishment allegedly refused, leaving her with no option but to pay the entire bill of Rs 4,811, including the disputed fee.The woman later approached the consumer commission, arguing that the restaurant had violated the Central Consumer Protection Authority's (CCPA) guidelines on service charges. The restaurant did not appear before the commission despite being given an opportunity to respond. The proceedings were therefore conducted ex parte.

In its order, the commission referred to the CCPA's guidelines issued on July 4, 2022, which prohibit hotels and restaurants from automatically adding a service charge to bills.

The guidelines state that establishments cannot collect such charges by default or under another name. They also make clear that payment of a service charge must remain voluntary, with consumers free to decide whether they want to pay it.

The commission said the restaurant had disregarded these provisions by refusing to remove the charge despite the customer's objection. It held the establishment guilty of deficiency in service and adopting an unfair trade practice, observing that its actions amounted to a blatant violation of the CCPA guidelines. Apart from ordering the restaurant to return the Rs 401 collected as service charge, the commission awarded the woman Rs 20,000 as compensation for mental harassment, pain and agony, and financial loss.

It also directed the restaurant to pay Rs 11,000 towards litigation expenses, taking the total amount payable to Rs 31,401, including the refund.

View the original on Times of India →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.