Bollywood HungamaSalman Khan returns in an action-packed avatar In Maatrubhumi: May War Rest In Peace, trailer out nowPunchUK coroner links school rules to teenager’s suicideThe Jerusalem PostOlympic judo champion Teddy Riner announces bid for French presidencyInquirer‘Evasive,’ conflicting answers test impeachment court’s patienceCNN TürkHegseth'e azil girişimi engellendiZDF heuteAktuelle Pressemitteilungen des ZDFSözcüTuvalet fırçası veya çöp kutusu değil: Evinizdeki en tehlikeli eşya mutfaktan-tvJunge trifft es besonders hart: Immer mehr Akademiker sind arbeitslos경향신문“수소트램 재검토 해야”···대전지역 시민사회단체 대책위 구성Wirtualna PolskaBulwersujące nagrania po ataku w Krakowie. TikTok reagujeLa NaciónLa historia del joven que emocionó a León XIV en la vigilia en Palermo: “Empecé a drogarme para no sentirme solo”CNN بالعربيةإيران.. رواج فيديو "مدينة صاروخية" تحت الأرض يكشفه الحرس الثوري
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, November 11, 2026

Trump’s triumphal arch has new enemies – the Kennedys

Translate

Washington: President Donald Trump’s planned 76-metre triumphal arch has come under legal fire on multiple fronts: from veterans, a historian and the governments of the District of Columbia, Virginia and Arlington County.

Now comes another legal challenge, from the storied Kennedy family.

Visitors at John F. Kennedy’s grave site at Arlington National Cemetery, with the Lincoln Memorial in the distance.The New York Times

Arguing that the arch, with its golden angels and flame on top, would cast a shadow on their relatives’ graves in Arlington National Cemetery, nine members of the Kennedy family moved to join existing litigation in Washington on Tuesday seeking to block the project.

They also say the arch would obstruct the intended sight line from the eternal flame at president John F. Kennedy’s gravesite, “destroying an essential element of the gravesite’s design.”

A judge in another case has temporarily paused construction of the arch – one of Trump’s favourite projects. If allowed to proceed, it would rise between the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington National Cemetery. The filing claims that the placement would obstruct “a line of sight that was designed to represent the unification of the nation following the Civil War and that has existed for nearly a century”.

A model of President Donald Trump’s proposed arch to commemorate the country’s 250th anniversary.Getty

The arch “will permanently cast a shadow over plaintiffs’ parents’ graves and the graves of servicemen and -women who made the ultimate sacrifice for this country,” the filing added.

The plaintiffs are children or grandchildren of senators Robert F. Kennedy and Edward M. Kennedy, the former president’s brothers, who are buried near him.

“A towering arch casting shadows across the graves of our father, mother and uncles, as well as the graves of so many who have served our country, would also cast a shadow over our democratic principles, undermining the safeguards established by our elected representatives to protect this hallowed ground for generations to come,” two of the plaintiffs, Rory Kennedy and Maxwell Kennedy, who are children of Robert Kennedy and Ethel Kennedy, said in a statement.

Trump’s project has received mixed news recently. On Thursday, the National Capital Planning Commission, led by the president’s allies, gave the project final approval, clearing the way for Trump to break ground. But immediately afterwards, a federal judge blocked construction.

The ruling by Judge Tanya Chutkan of the District Court for the District of Columbia halted construction for 14 days while legal challenges make their way through the court system.

In a 33-page opinion, Chutkan said the arch required congressional approval and that its construction could prove costly to both Virginia and the District of Columbia while disrupting traffic at the cemetery, one of the region’s most-visited sites.

The Kennedys’ lawsuit includes some of those same arguments but expands on the arch’s personal impact on the family.

John F. Kennedy (left) with brothers, Robert Kennedy (centre), and Ted Kennedy in 1960.AP Wirephoto

“The gigantic proposed arch is an illegal interference with Arlington National Cemetery and the heroes remembered there, including at the gravesites and memorials of the Kennedy brothers and Ethel Kennedy,” the plaintiffs’ lawyers, Norman Eisen and Steve Jonas of the Democracy Defenders Fund, said in a statement.

“Only Congress has the constitutional power to authorise an intrusion of this magnitude. Today, members of the Kennedy family are joining with the other litigants in this case to protect this historic site – and to defend the rule of law and separation of powers.”

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.

More:

View the original on The Sydney Morning Herald →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.