ESPNFrom superstar signings to under-the-radar finds: How each of MLB's four remaining teams were builtPunchSupreme Court delivered 411 judgments in one year – CJNThe Jerusalem PostIDF probes suspected negligence after officer killed in Humvee accident in southern LebanonESPN DeportesEx presidente Barça: Que Messi se despidaRTP Desporto12h30 Históricos de Betis e Lens anteveem Porto e SportingBollywood HungamaRian Mukherjee wins Best Child Actor at Los Angeles Film Awards 2026 for Hindi film ManzilZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-NachrichtenstudioIl Fatto Quotidiano“Barbara D’Urso porterà a casa circa 200 mila euro complessivi, cioè 15 mila euro a puntata”: ecco il cachet della giurata di “Ballando con le stelle”CBS NewsSaudi airport stays shut as Houthi attacks kill 20 people in a week7sur7Toute attaque contre l’Otan serait “totalement vaine”, assure son chefWirtualna PolskaTusk o policji w szkołach. "Tak, jesteśmy przeczuleni"RTL BoulevardTennisser Van de Zandschulp boekt in Shanghai knappe zege op Fils
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Monday, October 12, 2026

Defense's Sison calls Cabrera's testimony 'erroneous'; Diokno counters

Translate

Make this your preferred source to get more updates from this publisher on Google.

House prosecutor Representative Chel Diokno and defense lead counsel Sheila Sison on Monday exchanged words after the latter described as “erroneous” the testimony of financial forensic analyst Alexander Cabrera on the supposed unexplained wealth of Vice President Sara Duterte.

On the Day 38 of the impeachment trial, Sison gave a manifestation, saying that Cabrera was given an “extensive platform and opportunity” to give his “unbridled and erroneous conclusions of law and fact.”

Diokno moved to strike Sison’s statement, saying that it is a conclusion of law and “totally out of order.”

“It’s up to the Honorable Court to decide whether the opinion of Atty. Cabrera is acceptable or not. And it’s not in our place, whether I’m for the prosecution or for the defense, to make such irresponsible statements. I move to strike, Your Honor,” Diokno said.

Sison objected to the motion of the prosecutor.

“Well, I object to that motion, Your Honor. In fact, it came from the gentleman himself, the witness gave an opinion that in itself is proof that the witness only gave conclusions and not facts,” she said.

READ: Who is Alexander Cabrera, the financial forensic analyst witness?

Senate impeachment court presiding officer Francis Escudero intervened, ruling that Sison’s remarks remain in the records.

“Let it remain in the record, Honorable Chel… The [defense] clearly disagrees with the opinion of the expert, and from their point of view, she described it from their perspective and not necessarily the perspective of the court nor the prosecution. Then it is not per se strikable from the point of view of the court,” Escudero said.

Diokno made a counter-manifestation, expressing the view of the prosecution on the matter.

“In the view of the prosecution, the statement of the defense that the opinion is erroneous is totally out of place and has no meaning in this court,” he stressed. — BM, GMA News

Follow facebook.com/gmanewsonline for real-time news and developments in the Philippines and around the world.

View the original on GMA News →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.