ESPNNHL season preview: Rankings from 1-32 and what to know about every teamRTP DesportoPortugal-Noruega. Elogio de Jesus e Ronaldo titular na DinamarcaThe Jerusalem PostTwo states is not enough: Palestinians need sovereignty, Israelis need security - opinionDaily MaverickMADLANGA COMMISSION: Feroz Khan facing criminal charges for defying subpoena to appear at inquiryPunchMeet Danielle Adewusi, the doctor crowned Miss Universe Nigeria 2026Bollywood HungamaAnkur Rathee says Best Of The Best took him back to his college dancer days: “A version of myself I thought I had left behind”Sky TG24I titoli di Sky TG24 del 28 settembre, edizione delle 13SoompiSM Entertainment Announces Strict Legal Action Against Malicious Posts And Illegal AI-Generated Images Targeting Lim Yoona And aespa’s WinterIl Fatto QuotidianoRanucci-Rai, la destra contro la giudice: “È la stessa del caso Almasri”. I togati del Csm: “Tentativo di condizionamento”Egypt IndependentSisi moves to delegate certain Presidential powers to Defense Minister – here’s what that meansVilaWebEls treballadors de biblioteques de Barcelona critiquen la “tàctica de desgast” de l’Ajuntament després que anul·li la mesa de negociacióThe IndependentFive men arrested over RAF Fairford ‘bomb plot’ are British nationals, police say
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Monday, September 28, 2026

Apple and Amazon face revived UK consumer lawsuit over product sales

Translate

LONDON, Sept 28 : Britain's Competition Appeal Tribunal on Monday allowed part of a consumer lawsuit against Apple and Amazon to proceed over claims they restricted competition in the sale of Apple products on Amazon's UK marketplace.

The lawsuit alleges Apple and Amazon agreed in 2018 to limit which sellers could offer Apple and Beats-branded products on Amazon's UK website, reducing competition and inflating prices.

The three-judge tribunal allowed claims relating to Apple products bought through Amazon's marketplace to proceed, but rejected a broader claim covering products bought directly from Apple and other retailers.

The part of the case allowed to proceed could be worth between £289 million ($383 million) and £306 million, including interest, according to the claimant.

Judge Kelyn Bacon said claims relating to Amazon marketplace purchases were "plausible, credible and grounded in the facts", but rejected wider claims relating to other retailers because they rested on a "complex and speculative theory of harm".

The tribunal had refused last year to allow a largely similar lawsuit brought by consumer law academic Christine Riefa to go ahead because of concerns about the proposed class representative and litigation funding arrangements.

The claim was later refiled by Justin Le Patourel, who replaced Riefa as the proposed representative of consumers.

In its ruling, the tribunal said there was a realistic basis for arguing that restrictions on resellers could have led to higher prices for consumers buying Apple products through Amazon.

However, it said there was not enough evidence at this stage to support claims that the alleged conduct also increased prices for Apple products sold through Apple's own stores or by other retailers.

View the original on Channel News Asia →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.