ESPN DeportesYanks: Judge recibe inyección; duda para playoffsInquirerDefense, prosecution to present oral arguments on voting thresholdDaily MaverickGOING FOR A SONG OP-ED: AI and the future of creativity — can artists’ histories travel with their work?The Jerusalem PostErdogan calls Gaza suffering 'most embarrassing concentration camp' in UNGA speechPunchAnambra flood: Pupil missing as police rescue nine한겨레2연패 도전 여자 배드민턴, 안세영 승리에도 일본에 막혀 단체전 ‘동’SözcüTrafikte görünen H işaretli trafik levhası kafa karıştırıyor: Çoğu sürücü anlamını bilmiyorCNN TürkMenderes Belediyesi'ne ikinci dalga operasyon: 9 gözaltı경향신문용수 상수도 활용·전력망 지중화··· “호남 반도체 팹 2기 2028년 착공 목표”Het Laatste NieuwsDroomtransfer met een valse start: waarom de interlandbreak op het ideale moment komt voor Nathan De CatDaily MailAndy Burnham wobbles on Chagos as Trump hits out at 'terrible and ridiculous deal' during their first-ever meetingSportstarAsian Games 2026 Day 5, Live Updates: India wins bronze medals in skeet shooting; Mirabai Chanu confirms weightlifting medal; India takes on China in men's badminton
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, September 23, 2026

Court denies RimbaWatch’s bids for judicial review against ministries

Translate

The High Court here today dismissed environmental watchdog RimbaWatch’s applications for judicial review against two ministries over their alleged failure to investigate complaints concerning the “misleading” marketing of a fossil fuel product.

The applications sought to challenge decisions by the natural resources and environmental sustainability ministry (NRES) and the domestic trade and cost of living ministry (KPDN) last year.

RimbaWatch’s lawyer, Kumaresan Thurairaju, said justice Azizan Md Arshad dismissed the applications in chambers.

The court made no order as to costs.

Kumaresan said RimbaWatch would appeal the ruling and write to the court to request its grounds of judgment.

Senior federal counsel Syahriah Shapiee and Intan Syafinaz Ros’lin appeared for the two ministries, while lawyer Abhilaash Subramaniam appeared as amicus curiae for the Malaysian Bar.

Last year, RimbaWatch lodged complaints with NRES and KPDN over a fossil fuel company regarding the marketing of a product derived from fossil fuels as “carbon neutral”, which it claimed was misleading.

RimbaWatch said it filed the complaints with the two ministries because KPDN represented the ministry responsible for consumer protection, while NRES represented the ministry responsible for preventing pollution and protecting the environment.

“We suggest that, if indeed these claims are misleading as we believe, they could harm both consumer protection and climate protection interests,” it said.

However, KPDN informed RimbaWatch that the complaint fell outside its jurisdiction and should instead be filed with NRES.

NRES, meanwhile, told RimbaWatch to file the complaint with KPDN.

View the original on Free Malaysia Today

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.