Daily MaverickSPOTLIGHT: El Niño is here — are KwaZulu-Natal clinics ready?The Jerusalem PostIsrael excluded from COP31 climate summit in Turkey over Gaza war, Turkish minister saysPunch2027: Police partner tech firms to track deepfake creatorsInquirerSearch halted for teen swept away by big waves in Surigao del SurZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-Nachrichtenstudio20 MinutenRetter hören leises Weinen – und finden Baby Koah unter ErdeVariety‘Train to Busan’ Director Yeon Sang-ho on AI Thriller ‘Paradise Lost’: ‘Something as Mysterious and Unknowable to Us as a Black Hole’3DNewsMicrosoft прекратила поддержку Windows 11 23H2, выпустив последний патч безопасностиRTP DesportoJoão Pereira deixa comando técnico do Alanyaspor e é substituído por Ugur UcarESPNNHL Tonight: What to watch in Mammoth-Knights, five other games on WednesdayESPN DeportesCómo Harry Kane ganó el Balón de Oro y ya es el mejor inglés de la historiaHipertextualDisney+ confirma la fecha de estreno de ‘Avengers Endgame: Encore’, con nuevo final y conexión con ‘Doomsday’
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, November 11, 2026

Liverpool Should’ve Been Awarded Penalty vs Arsenal — Premier League Panel

Translate

A Premier League panel has revealed two VAR errors were made in Gameweek 9, including the Alexander Isak penalty incident against Arsenal.

The Key Match Incidents Panel has ruled that Liverpool should have been awarded a penalty due to the striker being pulled back by Jurrien Timber, according to talkSPORT.

Referee Andy Madley did not award a penalty on-field, while the incident was taken to the video assistant referee Stuart Attwell before being checked and cleared.

The Panel voted 4:1 that the penalty should have been awarded on the field, while a 3:2 vote decided the VAR should have intervened.

However, the Panel unanimously voted that Timber’s challenge did not warrant a red card.

Arsenal were leading 1-0 after an early goal from Kai Havertz, which proved to be the only goal of the game.

Following the match, Liverpool manager Andoni Iraola said: “There is a clear grab of the shirt. Alex was just in front of him. He was going to head in front of the goal, but couldn’t because he grabbed the shirt.

“If he goes to the floor, they call the penalty, 100 per cent. It should be like this, but it is what it is.

“Next time, the managers should tell Alex to go to the floor, otherwise they won’t call it. The answer is you have to dive. If you don’t dive they won’t call it.”

The Premier League released a statement, which read: “The panel felt that a penalty should have been awarded for a holding action by Timber on Isak, 4:1. One panellist considered the short-lived holding to lack clear impact on the ability of Isak to progress.

Also Read: I Feel Hurt –Mac Allister Reveals Pain Over Liverpool Contract Snub

“The majority also felt that VAR should have intervened to recommend an on-field review, 3:2, on the basis that it was a clear and obvious error.

“Two panellists considered that the subjectivity in assessing impact meant this did not meet the high threshold for VAR intervention.”

The league says match officials should penalise any holding actions that have a ‘clear material impact on play’.

They have directed referees to consider multiple factors when determining an offence, including whether a player is ‘focused solely on an opponent rather than the ball, if they are holding an opponent with both arms and if the holding is sustained or impactful to an opponent or their clothing.’

On this occasion, the panel have decided that the Arsenal defender’s challenge on the Sweden international met the standards for a holding offence.

Therefore, Liverpool should have been awarded a penalty kick, both on-field and through VAR intervention.

View the original on Complete Sports →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.