Daily MaverickESCAPE: Walking the Leopard Trail — Four days of fynbos, fatigue and fierce resilienceBollywood HungamaVikram Malhotra on Abundantia Entertainment evolving their AI division aiOn into a standalone studio, “It is being shaped as a fully-integrated, total capability movie studio”PunchPolice arrest four over sexual offences in BauchiThe Jerusalem PostBennett's comments about sitting with Netanyahu in next gov't were 'unsuccesful irony,' Lapid saysInquirerGatchalian: Defense to start presentation on Nov. 9ZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-NachrichtenstudioUOLAtaques houthis colocam infraestruturas sauditas 'à prova'; aeroporto de Riade segue fechadoColliderNetflix's Beloved Spy Thriller Officially Confirms Its Long-Awaited Season 2 DateThe Hollywood Reporter‘Rebellion’: Why the Bradford 12 Doc Is So Timely and Its Directors Want People to Know “Your Problems Are Created by Elon Musk, Not Migrants”Fotogramas"Una rareza gótica que acaba en delirio": La película sobre el primer caso de vampirismo en España documentado por la IglesiaBBC NewsSinn Féin ministers facing no-confidence vote after Drumcree disputeVanguardTribargain Unveils a New E-Commerce Platform for the Nigerian Market
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Monday, October 12, 2026

HC asks for Delhi Police stand on activist's plea over his 'detention'

Translate

New Delhi, The Delhi High Court on Monday asked the city police to file a status report in relation to civil rights activist Mohammad Wasiq Nadeem Khan's allegation that he was recently illegally detained to stop him from attending a peaceful protest at Jantar Mantar.

A bench of Acting Chief Justice Nitin Wasudeo Sambre and Justice Sanjay Sharma issued notice on Khan's petition, which also alleged constant surveillance and phone calls from police, and questioned the police's counsel on the conduct of the police personnel.

Although the bench acknowledged that the police have the right to deny permission for holding a protest, it orally questioned during the hearing, "How can you enter the house of this man? You have your right to conduct your duty how can you do it in such a way? Where is your cause to confine him?"

The petitioner's counsel claimed that on September 29, two police personnel visited his residence-cum-office and restrained his movement throughout the day.

The counsel alleged that he has been under constant surveillance and urged the court to declare that such conduct amounted to "harassment and arbitrary behaviour".

The petitioner's lawyer said the Supreme Court recently passed directions on ensuring free movement of people.

The police's counsel submitted that the petitioner was not detained in any manner, saying he even travelled to Kolkata last week and sought time from the court to bring their stand on record.

The police's lawyer also assured that the petitioner would not receive further phone calls.

The court was informed that the petitioner had earlier sought permission to hold a protest at Jantar Mantar on September 29, which was denied. The police's lawyer contended that certain personnel visited him only for a "query" based on information that he was going to participate in the agitation despite the denial.

Khan, who is the national secretary of the Association of Protection of Civil Rights and the founder of United Against Hate initiative, moved the high court last week, alleging that he was confined at the Jamaat-e-Islami Hind headquarters in Abul Fazal Enclave by police officials attached to Shaheen Bagh Police Station on September 29 from around 9:30 am to 5:30 pm, to prevent him from participating in a protest.

CR, Monitoring Committee of Indian Muslims and other civil society groups had called for a peaceful protest at Jantar Mantar on September 29 against alleged repeated attacks on places of worship.

The petitioner alleged that he was neither formally arrested nor provided with written grounds for his confinement. He also claimed that no arrest memo was prepared, no relative was informed and that he was not produced before a magistrate.

Khan further alleged that police personnel continued to contact him regarding his whereabouts in connection with subsequent protests on October 2 and October 5, creating apprehensions of further restrictions on his movement.

This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

View the original on Hindustan Times →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.