PunchPHOTOS: Osimhen resumes training ahead of Kasimpasa clashBollywood HungamaKiara Advani and Sidharth Malhotra announce second pregnancy with adorable post: “Blessed once again”The Jerusalem PostExtremist Israeli settlers attack Palestinian home in West Bank, set vehicle on fire - reportESPN DeportesMerino rescató a España y le dio la agónica victoria ante Croacia en la Nations LeagueDaily MaverickDRAFT DODGING: Three years, 6,000 pages, no labels: Who’s stalling SA’s food warnings?ESPNMessi marks tearful Argentina farewell with goal: Wish I could play foreverInquirerProsecution seeks to show Dutertes hid P96M via unused manager’s checksThe South AfricanLionel Messi retires from international football in styleSky TG24Lewis Capaldi compie 30 anni, le sue canzoni più famose da Someone you Loved a Forget MeBusiness AMAI-aandelen stuwen S&P 500 en Nasdaq naar nieuwe recordhoogtesZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-NachrichtenstudioRTP DesportoPortugal perde com Itália no Mundial feminino de hóquei
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, October 7, 2026

Govt can’t forfeit clean funds just because account held tainted money, court rules

Translate

The government cannot forfeit an entire bank account merely because part of the money in it is linked to criminal activity, the Court of Appeal has ruled.

A three-member bench allowed in part an appeal by LWC Good Service Sdn Bhd against a High Court order forfeiting RM1.36 million from two of its bank accounts under the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001 (Amla).

Justices K Muniandy, Azman Abdullah and Dean Wayne Daly heard the appeal.

Muniandy, who delivered the unanimous judgment, said the prosecution established a direct money trail showing the transfer of RM360,000 from a “mule account” linked to the Comoncaps investment scam into LWC’s Hong Leong Bank account.

However, he said there was no evidence linking the remaining funds to the scam.

The court ordered RM360,000 in the Hong Leong Bank account to be forfeited, but directed the return of RM863,179.84 in the same account and RM139,329.24 in LWC’s CIMB account.

“Suspicion, however compelling or grave, does not take the place of legal proof,” Muniandy said in the written grounds.

He said Amla could not be transformed into a “catch-all confiscation device” that allows money to be seized merely because a company’s corporate profile is irregular or its trading partners are financially non-compliant.

Muniandy said forfeiting funds not proven to be linked to unlawful activity would amount to an “unconstitutional deprivation of property without authority of law” under Article 13 of the Federal Constitution.

“The state cannot confiscate unrelated account balances based purely on suspicion, non-compliance or commingling without a predicate evidentiary link,” he said.

The court said the doctrine of severability required the proven tainted funds to be separated from the remaining balance.

LWC was among 28 respondents in civil forfeiture proceedings arising from the Comoncaps investment fraud in which 22 victims allegedly lost about RM3.49 million.

The High Court ordered the forfeiture of LWC’s entire Hong Leong Bank balance of RM1.223 million and its CIMB balance of RM139,329.24.

The Court of Appeal said the High Court erred by failing to distinguish the RM360,000 proven to be tainted from the remaining funds.

Subscribe to our newsletter and get news delivered to your mailbox.

View the original on Free Malaysia Today →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.