ESPN DeportesEN VIVO: ¡Habrá campeón o sobreviviente en innings extras!PunchLagos Assembly okays state police, demands clear power-sharingESPNTime to trade red-hot Ty Jerome, drop struggling Draymond Green?The Jerusalem Post'Eretz Nehederet' tackles Israel's election-night drama with Gal Gadot, political satire한겨레피해자 처벌불원서 위조한 특사경…공소청, 경찰에 수사 요청InquirerBukidnon showcases resilient harvests amid El NiñoUOLApuração em andamento em Israel mostra partido de Netanyahu à frente com 22,2% dos votosZDF heuteEntdecken Sie das ZDF-NachrichtenstudioThe Sydney Morning Herald‘Up until two seconds ago, I had not had contact’: In bizarre presser, council claims mayor had not resignedNPRPartnerships between ICE and local police surge, report finds中国新闻网“同心之歌响起的地方”,沪台音乐人金秋共叙“两岸一家亲”ColliderThe Perfect ‘Breaking Bad’ Cast if the Show Were Made in 2026
The Daily Newsstand · Free, Always
Wednesday, October 28, 2026

AI deepfake ads blur truth in US midterms

Translate

THE video looks hyper-real, depicting a US Senate candidate laughing at cards that read "Death to America" and "Celebrate 9/11".

But it is part of a multimillion-dollar blitz of artificial intelligence-generated political ads ahead of the midterm elections.

Reality-bending deepfake ads — dubbed AI "slopaganda" by researchers and used by both sides of the political aisle to target rivals — are proliferating across the airwaves and social media ahead of the Nov 3 vote.

"His family values are wrong for Michigan," said one ad that portrays Democratic candidate Abdul El-Sayed playing a board game with two people wearing traditional kaffiyehs, the checkered Arab scarves.

The lifelike ad features cards bearing incendiary statements and depicts a fabricated family photo of the Muslim candidate with four women wearing head-to-toe veils.

"Destruction of Israel and the West isn't just a game for them," a voiceover says. "It's a mission."

Front Line Action, a political action committee aligned with Republican Senator Ted Cruz, was behind the video.

It spent over US$92,000 on advertising opposing El-Sayed, according to a filing with the Federal Election Commission.

The ad carries a disclaimer that it was "created in whole or in part with the use of artificial intelligence".

Most AI-created ads do not carry such a label, researchers say, further distorting an information landscape already plagued by election disinformation.

The Wesleyan Media Project, which tracks election ad spending, has so far identified 220 political ads nationwide — most sponsored by Republicans — that were generated at least in part using AI tools.

It estimates that the ads cost more than US$137 million. By comparison, it identified less than US$50,000 in spending on AI-generated ads in the 2024 election cycle.

Eighty-one per cent of the AI-created ads were sponsored by Republican candidates or groups, 12 per cent by Democrats, and the remainder by independent candidates or groups, it added.

"AI is making its way into the 2026 midterms in a big way this year," said Erika Franklin Fowler, co-director of the Wesleyan Media Project.

She added that only 27 per cent of the ads carried an AI disclaimer, calling the trend "problematic".

The group said its ads tally was almost certainly an undercount as it was difficult to determine definitively whether AI tools had been used in their creation.

There were no federal mandates that political ads carry an AI disclaimer, though some states have legislated to restrict the use of AI or require disclosures.

"It is deeply troubling to see these deepfake videos used to fabricate political advertising," Democratic Senator Jon Ossoff told C-SPAN last month.

"And it's a slippery slope toward the destruction of truth in political debate."

Ossoff's comment came as he demanded the removal of a fabricated ad, which carried no AI disclosure, portraying him receiving beauty treatments at a salon and covering up his "ugly record".

The Senate Leadership Fund, a political action committee that describes itself as "solely dedicated to protecting and expanding the Republican Senate majority", was behind the ad.

The proliferation of such ads in the midterms — which the London-based Institute for Strategic Dialogue called the first US election in which AI is built into every major social media platform — comes against the backdrop of declining trust in the technology.

In a recent survey by the nonprofit AAPC Foundation, 73 per cent said it was "unacceptable" for a political campaign to use AI to generate images or video in an ad.

Ninety-five per cent said it was unacceptable to "create a video of an opponent saying something they never said".

But researchers played down concerns that the ads could influence election results.

"Political slopaganda is likely more effective at mobilising voters or raising money than it is in impacting candidate selection," New York University's Center on Tech Policy said in a research report earlier this month.

"Like digital memes, there may be limits to its attentional staying power, especially as we become more and more inundated with AI slop."

View the original on New Straits Times →

KioskNews shows a cleaned-up reading view extracted from the publisher’s page — the original always lives on their site, not ours.